Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31856894›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

Assessment of differences between DNA content of cell-cultured and freely suspended oocysts of Cryptosporidium parvum and their suitability as DNA standards in qPCR.

Ian D Woolsey, Berit Blomstrand, Øivind Øines, Heidi L Enemark

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Apical-out bovine intestinal organoids as an infection model forCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ian D WoolseyDepartment of Animal Health and Food Safety, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Ullevålsveien 68, 0454, Oslo, Norway. ian.woolsey@vetinst.no.
Berit BlomstrandNorwegian Centre for Organic Agriculture, Gunnars veg 6, 6630, Tingvoll, Norway.
Øivind ØinesDepartment of Animal Health and Food Safety, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Ullevålsveien 68, 0454, Oslo, Norway.
Heidi L EnemarkDepartment of Animal Health and Food Safety, Norwegian Veterinary Institute, Ullevålsveien 68, 0454, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Veterinary Institute · NONORCE Norwegian Research Centre · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough more modern methods are available, quantitative PCR (qPCR) is reproducible, sensitive and specific with instruments and expertise readily available in many laboratories. As such, the use of qPCR in Cryptosporidium research is well established and still widely used by researchers globally. This method depends upon the generation of standards at different concentrations to generate standard curves subsequently used for the quantification of DNA.

methodsWe assessed four types of DNA template used to generate standard curves in drug screening studies involving Cryptosporidium spp.: (i) serially diluted Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts (10

resultsSerial dilutions of both cell culture and pure oocyst suspension DNA template yielded better linearity than cell culture derived standards, with dilutions of 10

conclusionsFor many studies involving Cryptosporidium, only relative DNA content is required and as such, the superior linearity afforded by freely suspended oocysts and diluted DNA template (from either cell culture derived standards or freely suspended oocysts) will allow for more accurate relative quantification in each assay. Parasite division in the cell culture standards likely explains the higher DNA content found. These standards, therefore, have the potential to more accurately reflect DNA content in cell culture assays, and despite more modern methods available for absolute quantification, i.e. droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), the ubiquity of qPCR for the foreseeable future encourages further investigation into the reduced linearity observed in these standards such as varying oocyst seeding density, non-linear growth rates and assay efficiency.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidium parvumDNA, ProtozoanHumansOocystsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionDNA, ProtozoanCell cultureCryptosporidiumHCT-8qPCR

Identifiers

PMID31856894
PMCPMC6923971
OpenAlexW2995914391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.