Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31856826›Full record

SynthesisThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2019

Effect of workplace physical activity interventions on the cardio-metabolic health of working adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rubina Mulchandani, Ambalam M Chandrasekaran, Roopa Shivashankar, Dimple Kondal, Anurag Agrawal, Jeemon Panniyammakal, Nikhil Tandon, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Meenakshi Sharma, Shifalika Goenka

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Defaults at Work: A Field Experiment on the Effect of Nudges on Stand-Up Working.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rubina MulchandaniIndian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.
Ambalam M ChandrasekaranCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Roopa ShivashankarCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Dimple KondalCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Anurag AgrawalCSIR Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India.
Jeemon PanniyammakalSree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Nikhil TandonAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.
Dorairaj PrabhakaranCentre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India.
Meenakshi SharmaIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Shifalika GoenkaIndian Institute of Public Health-Delhi, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India. shifalika.goenka@phfi.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6993-2883
Centre for Chronic Disease Control · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INGovernment Medical College · INIndian Council of Medical Research · INInstitute of Genomics and Integrative Biology · INInstitute of Public Health Bengaluru · IN

Funding

Health systems & implementation sciences institute for NCDs in SoAsia & LatinAmD43TW009135 · FIC · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LOZANO, RAFAEL, NARAYAN, KABAYAM M VENKAT · 2012 to 2016
$1.1M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009135Wellcome Trust 096735/B/11/ZWellcome Trust 203124/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdults in urban areas spend almost 77% of their waking time being inactive at workplaces, which leaves little time for physical activity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize evidence for the effect of workplace physical activity interventions on the cardio-metabolic health markers (body weight, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, lipids and blood glucose) among working adults.

methodsAll experimental studies up to March 2018, reporting cardio-metabolic worksite intervention outcomes among adult employees were identified from PUBMED, EMBASE, COCHRANE CENTRAL, CINAHL and PsycINFO. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess bias in studies. All studies were assessed qualitatively and meta-analysis was done where possible. Forest plots were generated for pooled estimates of each study outcome.

resultsA total of 33 studies met the eligibility criteria and 24 were included in the meta-analysis. Multi-component workplace interventions significantly reduced body weight (16 studies; mean diff: - 2.61 kg, 95% CI: - 3.89 to - 1.33) BMI (19 studies, mean diff: - 0.42 kg/m

conclusionsWorkplace interventions significantly reduced body weight, BMI and waist circumference. Non-significant results for biochemical markers could be due to them being secondary outcomes in most studies. Intervention acceptability and adherence, follow-up duration and exploring non-RCT designs are factors that need attention in future research. Prospero registration number: CRD42018094436.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBody Mass IndexAdultBlood PressureBody SizeExerciseHumansLipidsSedentary BehaviorWorkplaceBlood GlucoseLipidsCardiovascular diseasePhysical activityWorksite interventions

Identifiers

PMID31856826
PMCPMC6923867
OpenAlexW2995813868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.