Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31856780›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

MOBIlity assessment with modern TEChnology in older patients' real-life by the General Practitioner: the MOBITEC-GP study protocol.

Mareike Münch, Robert Weibel, Alexandros Sofios, Haosheng Huang, Denis Infanger, Erja Portegijs, Eleftheria Giannouli, Jonas Mundwiler, Lindsey Conrow, Taina Rantanen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Map-based assessment of older adults' life space: validity and reliability.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mareike MünchDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division of Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel, Birsstrasse 320 B, 4052, Basel, Switzerland.
Robert WeibelGeographical Information Systems Unit, Department of Geography, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Alexandros SofiosGeographical Information Systems Unit, Department of Geography, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Haosheng HuangGeographical Information Systems Unit, Department of Geography, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Denis InfangerDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division of Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel, Birsstrasse 320 B, 4052, Basel, Switzerland.
Erja PortegijsGerontology Research Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Eleftheria GiannouliDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division of Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel, Birsstrasse 320 B, 4052, Basel, Switzerland.
Jonas MundwilerCenter for Primary Health Care, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Lindsey ConrowGeographical Information Systems Unit, Department of Geography, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Taina RantanenGerontology Research Center and Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Arno Schmidt-TrucksässDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division of Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel, Birsstrasse 320 B, 4052, Basel, Switzerland.
Andreas ZellerCenter for Primary Health Care, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Timo HinrichsDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division of Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel, Birsstrasse 320 B, 4052, Basel, Switzerland. timo.hinrichs@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6200-307X
University of Basel · CHUniversity of Zurich · CHUniversity of Jyväskylä · FI

Funding

Velux Stiftung 1155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobility limitations in older adults are associated with poor clinical outcomes including higher mortality and disability rates. A decline in mobility (including physical function and life-space) is detectable and should be discovered as early as possible, as it can still be stabilized or even reversed in early stages by targeted interventions. General practitioners (GPs) would be in the ideal position to monitor the mobility of their older patients. However, easy-to-use and valid instruments for GPs to conduct mobility assessment in the real-life practice setting are missing. Modern technologies such as the global positioning system (GPS) and inertial measurement units (IMUs) - nowadays embedded in every smartphone - could facilitate monitoring of different aspects of mobility in the GP's practice.

methodsThis project's aim is to provide GPs with a novel smartphone application that allows them to quantify their older patients' mobility. The project consists of three parts: development of the GPS- and IMU-based application, evaluation of its validity and reliability (Study 1), and evaluation of its applicability and acceptance (Study 2). In Study 1, participants (target N = 72, aged 65+, ≥2 chronic diseases) will perform a battery of walking tests (varying distances; varying levels of standardization). Besides videotaping and timing (gold standard), a high-end GPS device, a medium-accuracy GPS/IMU logger and three different smartphone models will be used to determine mobility parameters such as gait speed. Furthermore, participants will wear the medium-accuracy GPS/IMU logger and a smartphone for a week to determine their life-space mobility. Participants will be re-assessed after 1 week. In Study 2, participants (target N = 60, aged 65+, ≥2 chronic diseases) will be instructed on how to use the application by themselves. Participants will perform mobility assessments independently at their own homes. Aggregated test results will also be presented to GPs. Acceptance of the application will be assessed among patients and GPs. The application will then be finalized and publicly released. DISCUSSION: If successful, the MOBITEC-GP application will offer health care providers the opportunity to follow their patients' mobility over time and to recognize impending needs (e.g. for targeted exercise) within pre-clinical stages of decline.

Indexed as

General PractitionersMobile ApplicationsMobility LimitationSmartphoneAgedFemaleGeographic Information SystemsGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleMonitoring, AmbulatoryMultimorbidityPatient Acceptance of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignTechnologyAgingGeneral practiceGeographic information systemsHealth promotionInertial sensorsMobility limitationMultimorbiditySmartphoneSpatial behaviorWalking speed

Identifiers

PMID31856780
PMCPMC6923848
OpenAlexW2995160016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.