Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31856770›Full record

Observational studyBMC psychiatry2019

Intensive home treatment for adolescents in psychiatric crisis.

Jet B Muskens, Pierre C M Herpers, Caroline Hilderink, Patricia A M van Deurzen, Jan K Buitelaar, Wouter G Staal

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Integrating home treatment into the Austrian child and adolescent mental health care system: an implementation science perspective.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jet B MuskensKarakter, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Centre, Reinier Postlaan 12, 6525 GC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. j.muskens@karakter.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1157-3184
Pierre C M HerpersKarakter, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Centre, Reinier Postlaan 12, 6525 GC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Caroline HilderinkKarakter, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Centre, Reinier Postlaan 12, 6525 GC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Patricia A M van DeurzenKarakter, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Centre, Reinier Postlaan 12, 6525 GC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan K BuitelaarKarakter, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Centre, Reinier Postlaan 12, 6525 GC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wouter G StaalKarakter, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Centre, Reinier Postlaan 12, 6525 GC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents with acute psychiatric disorders are typically treated with long-term clinical admission. However, long term admission may be associated with a variety of negative outcomes. This pilot study presents a new model of care, that is, the combined application of intensive home treatment and the possibility of short term stay at a psychiatric high & intensive care.

methodsIn total 112 referred adolescents with mixed diagnoses participated in this longitudinal observational design. Clinical outcome was measured by the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) which measures the severity of multiple mental health problems. The HoNOSCA was clinician-rated at intake, after two months and after four months at discharge. Change in HoNOSCA total score was analysed with paired t-tests. Outcome moderators were gender, age, primary diagnosis, clinical admission, home treatment-time, medication and additional therapies. Follow up data were completed for 62 patients after two months and for 53 after four months.

resultsParticipants aged between 11 and 18 years (M = 14.8 years, SD = 0.3; 52% female). Mean HoNOSCA total score at intake was 18.8 (SD = 5.2), after two months 13.0 (SD = 5.0); after four months resulting in a score of 9.3 (SD = 5.2). None of the moderators tested showed a significant effect on HoNOSCA scores. However, a control group could not be used because of the severe psychopathology and high risk for suicidality and the lack of an effective treatment intervention for a comparable study group.

conclusionWith a symptom decrease of over 50% within four months as measured by the HoNOSCA, including less risk for hospitalization, this new model appears promising and of clinical relevance. Nevertheless, further research regarding stability of treatment outcome is warranted and evaluation of long-term effects of this model in follow-up studies is needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent Health ServicesAnalysis of VarianceChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHome Care ServicesHospitalizationHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesNetherlandsOutcome Assessment, Health CarePilot ProjectsAdolescent psychiatryClinical admissionCrisis interventionHigh & intensive careIntensive home treatment

Identifiers

PMID31856770
PMCPMC6924140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.