Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31856754›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2019

Claims data-based analysis of the influence of individual and regional characteristics on the utilisation of long-term care by people with dementia in Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany.

Johanna Forstner, Michel Wensing, Jan Koetsenruijter, Pamela Wronski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna ForstnerDepartment for General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Marsilius Arkaden, Turm West, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. johanna.forstner@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3052-5030
Michel WensingDepartment for General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Marsilius Arkaden, Turm West, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan KoetsenruijterDepartment for General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Marsilius Arkaden, Turm West, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pamela WronskiDepartment for General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, Marsilius Arkaden, Turm West, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChallenges of future dementia care include increasing shortage of qualified healthcare providers and decreasing potential of informal care by relatives. In order to meet those challenges, changes in dementia care are needed. These changes should be based on data of both care utilisation and care supply. The aim of this study was to provide insight into individual and regional characteristics that influence the utilisation of long-term care by people with dementia.

methodsThe study was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of claims-based data and other available data referring to one index year. All data were aggregated for small geographic districts. The study population comprised people with a dementia diagnosis, 65 years and older in Baden-Wuerttemberg and insured by the largest health insurer. Utilisation of nursing home care, informal care, and respite care was analysed using binary coded logistic multilevel analyses.

resultsSeventy nine thousand three hundred forty-nine people with dementia were included in the analyses. Nursing home care was used by 20.4%, informal care by 30.6%, and respite care by 3.5% of people with dementia. Individual characteristics that influence care utilisation included age, sex and the level of care dependency. The utilisation of informal care (OR = 1.713) and respite care (OR = 2.036) was higher in rural districts than in city districts. Respite care supply had an effect on the utilisation of respite care (OR = 1.173).

conclusionsThe study found differences between districts in the utilisation of long-term care for dementia. These differences were largely explained by the composition of the population within the districts. An exception was the utilisation of respite care, which was higher in districts which have higher supply. Individual characteristics that influenced care utilisation are age, sex, level of care dependency and, with regard to informal care, comorbidity. Further research should be conducted on a small-area level, include further individual characteristics as well as other care and living forms.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCross-Sectional StudiesDementiaFemaleGermanyHumansInsurance Claim ReviewLong-Term CareMaleRetrospective StudiesBaden-WurttembergClaims dataDementiaInformal careLong-term careMultilevel analysisRegional variationRespite care

Identifiers

PMID31856754
PMCPMC6923896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.