Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31856227›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Experimental infection of lambs with tick-borne encephalitis virus and co-infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum.

Katrine M Paulsen, Erik G Granquist, Wenche Okstad, Rose Vikse, Karin Stiasny, Åshild K Andreassen, Snorre Stuen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microorganisms inInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  2. Vector-borne diseases-knowledge maps.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Differential susceptibility of geographically distinctEmerging microbes & infections · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Food-Borne Transmission of Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus-Spread, Consequences, and Prophylaxis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katrine M PaulsenDepartment of Virology, Division for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5680-7426
Erik G GranquistDepartment of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway.
Wenche OkstadSection of Small Ruminant Research and Herd Health, Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Sandnes, Norway.
Rose VikseDepartment of Virology, Division for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Karin StiasnyCenter for Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Åshild K AndreassenDepartment of Virology, Division for Infection Control and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Snorre StuenSection of Small Ruminant Research and Herd Health, Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Sandnes, Norway.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NOMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is a zoonotic pathogen which may cause tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in humans and animals. More than 10,000 cases of TBE are reported annually in Europe and Asia. However, the knowledge on TBE in animals is limited. Co-infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum and louping ill virus (LIV), a close relative to TBEV, in sheep has been found to cause more severe disease than single LIV or A. phagocytophilum infection. The aim of this study was to investigate TBEV infection and co-infection of TBEV and A. phagocytophilum in lambs. A total of 30 lambs, aged five to six months, were used. The experiment was divided into two. In part one, pre- and post-infection of TBEV and A. phagocytophilum was investigated (group 1 to 4), while in part two, co-infection of TBEV and A. phagocytophilum was investigated (group 5 and 6). Blood samples were drawn, and rectal temperature was measured daily. Lambs inoculated with TBEV displayed no clinical symptoms, but had a short or non-detectable viremia by reverse transcription real-time PCR. All lambs inoculated with TBEV developed neutralizing TBEV antibodies. Our study is in accordance with previous studies, and indicates that TBEV rarely causes symptomatic disease in ruminants. All lambs inoculated with A. phagocytophilum developed fever and clinical symptoms of tick-borne fever, and A. phagocytophilum was present in the blood samples of all infected lambs, shown by qPCR. Significantly higher mean TBEV titer was detected in the group co-infected with TBEV and A. phagocytophilum, compared to the groups pre- or post-infected with A. phagocytophilum. These results indicate that co-infection with TBEV and A. phagocytophilum in sheep stimulates an increased TBEV antibody response.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumAnaplasmosisAnimalsCoinfectionEncephalitis, Tick-BorneEncephalitis Viruses, Tick-BorneFemaleMaleSheepSheep Diseases

Identifiers

PMID31856227
PMCPMC6922421
OpenAlexW2995829145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.