Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31856213›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The effect of gut passage by waterbirds on the seed coat and pericarp of diaspores lacking "external flesh": Evidence for widespread adaptation to endozoochory in angiosperms.

Mihai Costea, Hiba El Miari, Levente Laczkó, Réka Fekete, Attila V Molnár, Ádám Lovas-Kiss, Andy J Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Invasive ButtonweedPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Functional packaging of seeds.The New phytologist · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mihai CosteaDepartment of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3049-1763
Hiba El MiariDepartment of Biology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Levente LaczkóDepartment of Botany, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Réka FeketeDepartment of Botany, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Attila V MolnárDepartment of Botany, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Ádám Lovas-KissDepartment of Tisza Research, Wetland Ecology Research Group, MTA Centre for Ecological Research-DRI, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-8811-1623
Andy J GreenWetland Ecology Department, Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1268-4951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widely accepted "endozoochory syndrome" is assigned to angiosperm diaspores with a fleshy, attractive tissue and implies the existence of adaptations for protection against digestion during gut passage. This syndrome has led diaspore fleshiness to be emphasized as the exclusive indicator of endozoochory in much of the ecology and biogeography research. Crucially, however, endozoochory in nature is not limited to frugivory, and diaspores without "external flesh" are commonly dispersed, often over long distances, via birds and mammals by granivory. A key question is: are such diaspores somehow less prepared from an architectural point of view to survive gut passage than fleshy diaspores? To answer this question, we selected 11 European angiosperm taxa that fall outside the classical endozoochory syndrome yet are known to be dispersed via endozoochory. We studied their seed coat/pericarp morphology and anatomy both before and after gut passage through granivorous waterfowl, and determined their seed survival and germinability. We found no fundamental differences in the mechanical architecture of the seed coat and pericarp between these plants dispersed by granivory and others dispersed by frugivory. Neither diaspore traits per se, nor dormancy type, were strong predictors of diaspore survival or degree of damage during gut passage through granivores, or of the influence of gut passage on germinability. Among our 11 taxa, survival of gut passage is enabled by the thick cuticle of the exotesta or epicarp; one or several lignified cell layers; and diverse combinations of other architectural elements. These protection structures are ubiquitous in angiosperms, and likely to have evolved in gymnosperms. Hence, many angiosperm diaspores, dry or fleshy, may be pre-adapted to endozoochory, but with differing degrees of specialization and adaptation to dispersal mechanisms such as frugivory and granivory. Our findings underline the broad ecological importance of "non-classical endozoochory" of diaspores that lack "external flesh".

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalFruitSeed DispersalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBirdsDigestionGerminationIntestinesMagnoliopsida

Identifiers

PMID31856213
PMCPMC6922415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.