ArticlePloS one2019
De novo identification of satellite DNAs in the sequenced genomes of Drosophila virilis and D. americana using the RepeatExplorer and TAREAN pipelines.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Satellite DNA evolution in two holocentric species of Edessa true bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) with unusually high heterochromatin abundance.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Satellite DNA dynamics across phylogenetic scales in ground beetles and other insects.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Transposable elements as drivers of genome evolution in Drosophila virilis.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Satellite DNA Genomics: The Ongoing Story.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Article
- Holocentric repeat landscapes: From micro-evolutionary patterns to macro-evolutionary associations with karyotype evolution.Molecular ecology · 2024Article
- High-Quality Genome Assemblies Reveal Evolutionary Dynamics of Repetitive DNA and Structural Rearrangements in the Drosophila virilis Subgroup.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Making the Genome Huge: The Case ofGenes · 2023Article
- Article
- In-Depth Satellitome Analyses of 37 Drosophila Species Illuminate Repetitive DNA Evolution in the Drosophila Genus.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Satellitome Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Structure, Organization, and Evolution of Satellite DNAs: Insights from the Drosophila repleta and D. virilis Species Groups.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2021Article
- Identification and characterization of repetitive DNA in the genus Didelphis Linnaeus, 1758 (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae) and the use of satellite DNAs as phylogenetic markers.Genetics and molecular biology · 2021Article
- The Role of Satellite DNAs in Genome Architecture and Sex Chromosome Evolution in Crambidae Moths.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Satellite DNA-like repeats are dispersed throughout the genome of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas carried by Helentron non-autonomous mobile elements.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Sequence Composition Underlying Centromeric and Heterochromatic Genome Compartments of the Pacific OysterGenes · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Satellite DNAs are among the most abundant repetitive DNAs found in eukaryote genomes, where they participate in a variety of biological roles, from being components of important chromosome structures to gene regulation. Experimental methodologies used before the genomic era were insufficient, too laborious and time-consuming to recover the collection of all satDNAs from a genome. Today, the availability of whole sequenced genomes combined with the development of specific bioinformatic tools are expected to foster the identification of virtually all the "satellitome" of a particular species. While whole genome assemblies are important to obtain a global view of genome organization, most of them are incomplete and lack repetitive regions. We applied short-read sequencing and similarity clustering in order to perform a de novo identification of the most abundant satellite families in two Drosophila species from the virilis group: Drosophila virilis and D. americana, using the Tandem Repeat Analyzer (TAREAN) and RepeatExplorer pipelines. These species were chosen because they have been used as models to understand satDNA biology since the early 70's. We combined the computational approach with data from the literature and chromosome mapping to obtain an overview of the major tandem repeat sequences of these species. The fact that all of the abundant tandem repeats (TRs) we detected were previously identified in the literature allowed us to evaluate the efficiency of TAREAN in correctly identifying true satDNAs. Our results indicate that raw sequencing reads can be efficiently used to detect satDNAs, but that abundant tandem repeats present in dispersed arrays or associated with transposable elements are frequent false positives. We demonstrate that TAREAN with its parent method RepeatExplorer may be used as resources to detect tandem repeats associated with transposable elements and also to reveal families of dispersed tandem repeats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.