Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31856050›Full record

ArticleChinese medical journal2019

Establishment and application of an artificial intelligence diagnosis system for pancreatic cancer with a faster region-based convolutional neural network.

Shang-Long Liu, Shuo Li, Yu-Ting Guo, Yun-Peng Zhou, Zheng-Dong Zhang, Shuai Li, Yun Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Role of circulating exosomal biomarkers and their diagnostic accuracy in pancreatic cancer.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shang-Long LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.
Shuo LiDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.
Yu-Ting GuoState Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yun-Peng ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.
Zheng-Dong ZhangState Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Shuai LiState Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China.
Yun LuDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, China.
Beihang University · CNQingdao University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Qingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diagnosis and accurate staging are important to improve the cure rate and prognosis for pancreatic cancer. This study was performed to develop an automatic and accurate imaging processing technique system, allowing this system to read computed tomography (CT) images correctly and make diagnosis of pancreatic cancer faster.

methodsThe establishment of the artificial intelligence (AI) system for pancreatic cancer diagnosis based on sequential contrast-enhanced CT images were composed of two processes: training and verification. During training process, our study used all 4385 CT images from 238 pancreatic cancer patients in the database as the training data set. Additionally, we used VGG16, which was pre-trained in ImageNet and contained 13 convolutional layers and three fully connected layers, to initialize the feature extraction network. In the verification experiment, we used sequential clinical CT images from 238 pancreatic cancer patients as our experimental data and input these data into the faster region-based convolution network (Faster R-CNN) model that had completed training. Totally, 1699 images from 100 pancreatic cancer patients were included for clinical verification.

resultsA total of 338 patients with pancreatic cancer were included in the study. The clinical characteristics (sex, age, tumor location, differentiation grade, and tumor-node-metastasis stage) between the two training and verification groups were insignificant. The mean average precision was 0.7664, indicating a good training effect of the Faster R-CNN. Sequential contrast-enhanced CT images of 100 pancreatic cancer patients were used for clinical verification. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve calculated according to the trapezoidal rule was 0.9632. It took approximately 0.2 s for the Faster R-CNN AI to automatically process one CT image, which is much faster than the time required for diagnosis by an imaging specialist.

conclusionsFaster R-CNN AI is an effective and objective method with high accuracy for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

trial registrationChiCTR1800017542; http://www.chictr.org.cn.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPancreatic NeoplasmsROC CurveTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID31856050
PMCPMC6940082
OpenAlexW2990550398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.