ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2020
Characterization of
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reducing scan time burden for neonatal MRI of pulmonary structure using FLORET UTE.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Pulmonary MRI in Newborns and Children.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Quantitative Imaging Metrics for the Assessment of Pulmonary Pathophysiology: An Official American Thoracic Society and Fleischner Society Joint Workshop Report.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023Article
- HyperpolarizedRadiology · 2022Article
- Effects of neonatal lung abnormalities on parenchymal RJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2021Article
- Modern pulmonary imaging of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeNovel demonstration of
methods
resultsEstimates in the phantom did not differ significantly from ground truth. Neonates had significantly lower mean
conclusionEstimation of tissue density and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.