ArticleMedical physics2020
A 3D deep convolutional neural network approach for the automated measurement of cerebellum tracer uptake in FDG PET-CT scans.
Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Localization of TSH-secreting pituitary adenoma using 11C-methionine image subtraction.EJNMMI research · 2022Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in brain molecular imaging.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this work was to assess the potential of deep convolutional neural networks in automated measurement of cerebellum tracer uptake in F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) scans.
methodsThree different three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural network architectures (U-Net, V-Net, and modified U-Net) were implemented and compared regarding their performance in 3D cerebellum segmentation in FDG PET scans. For network training and testing, 134 PET scans with corresponding manual volumetric segmentations were utilized. For segmentation performance assessment, a fivefold cross-validation was used, and the Dice coefficient as well as signed and unsigned distance errors were calculated. In addition, standardized uptake value (SUV) uptake measurement performance was assessed by means of a statistical comparison to an independent reference standard. Furthermore, a comparison to a previously reported active-shape-model-based approach was performed.
resultsOut of the three convolutional neural networks investigated, the modified U-Net showed significantly better segmentation performance. It achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.911 ± 0.026, a signed distance error of 0.220 ± 0.103 mm, and an unsigned distance error of 1.048 ± 0.340 mm. When compared to the independent reference standard, SUV uptake measurements produced with the modified U-Net showed no significant error in slope and intercept. The estimated reduction in total SUV measurement error was 95.1%.
conclusionsThe presented work demonstrates the potential of deep convolutional neural networks in automated SUV measurement of reference regions. While it focuses on the cerebellum, utilized methods can be generalized to other reference regions like the liver or aortic arch. Future work will focus on combining lesion and reference region analysis into one approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.