Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31855153›Full record

Trial reportBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2020

Optimising prophylaxis outcomes and costs in haemophilia patients switching to recombinant FVIII-Fc: a single-centre real-world experience.

Annarita Tagliaferri, Annalisa Matichecchia, Gianna F Rivolta, Federica Riccardi, Gabriele Quintavalle, Anna Benegiamo, Rossana Rossi, Antonio Coppola

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Emerging benefits of Fc fusion technology in the context of recombinant factor VIII replacement therapy.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Therapeutic choices in persons with haemophilia at the time of COVID-19.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annarita TagliaferriRegional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding Disorders, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Annalisa MatichecchiaRegional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding Disorders, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Gianna F RivoltaRegional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding Disorders, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Federica RiccardiRegional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding Disorders, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Gabriele QuintavalleRegional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding Disorders, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Anna BenegiamoLaboratory of Coagulation, Department of Diagnostics, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Rossana RossiLaboratory of Coagulation, Department of Diagnostics, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Antonio CoppolaRegional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding Disorders, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
University of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII)-IgG1 Fc fusion protein (rFVIII-Fc) was the first available extended half-life rFVIII, shown to prolong dosing intervals of individualised prophylaxis in patients with severe haemophilia A, maintaining low bleeding rates and unchanged or lower FVIII dose versus standard half-life (SHL) rFVIII. Few data are available about real-world experience with rFVIII-Fc, including criteria for patient switching from SHL products, follow up and prophylaxis optimisation. MATERIALS AND

methodsA single-centre retrospective study was designed to review patients switched to rFVIII-Fc, based on individual needs, after pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment, according to routine clinical practice. In patients with adequate post-switch follow up, data about rFVIII-Fc prophylaxis were compared with those from the last 18-months SHL rFVIII prophylaxis.

resultsOf 25 candidates, 18 patients (15 severe, 3 moderate; aged 9-62 years; 3 with inhibitor history) started rFVIII-Fc regimens, with comparable FVIII weekly dose and reduced infusion frequency (mean -30%) in all 17 patients previously on SHL rFVIII prophylaxis thrice weekly or every other day. Over a mean 18-month follow up in 13 patients, compared with SHL products, further reduced infusion frequency (mean -40%; p<0.001; interval ≥4 days in 9 patients), improved treatment satisfaction (Hemo-sat questionnaires), significantly lower FVIII weekly dose and annual consumption (mean -12%; p=0.019), comparable bleeding rates and FVIII trough levels, and improved management of breakthrough bleeding were observed. von Willebrand Factor Antigen (VWF:Ag) correlated to PK variables and both had relationships with rFVIII-Fc weekly dose, increasing statistical significance over the follow-up period. No inhibitors or drug-related adverse events were recorded. DISCUSSION: In this real-world series of patients, a switch to rFVIII-Fc, based on careful assessment of clinical needs, PK testing and treatment monitoring, was able to optimise individual convenience, efficacy and costs of prophylaxis.

Indexed as

Factor VIIIHemophilia AHemorrhageImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAdolescentAdultChildCosts and Cost AnalysisFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesF8 protein, humanFactor VIIIImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31855153
PMCPMC7592167
OpenAlexW2995564136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.