Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31854955›Full record

ArticleJournal of health organization and management2019

Partnering for change.

Martha L P MacLeod, Neil Hanlon, Trish Reay, David Snadden, Cathy Ulrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health organization and management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martha L P MacLeodSchool of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada.
Neil HanlonDepartment of Geography, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada.
Trish ReayDepartment of Strategic Management and Organization, University of Alberta Alberta School of Business, Edmonton, Canada.
David SnaddenNorthern Medical Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Cathy UlrichNorthern Health Authority, Prince George, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite many calls to strengthen connections between health systems and communities as a way to improve primary healthcare, little is known about how new collaborations can effectively alter service provision. The purpose of this paper is to explore how a health authority, municipal leaders and physicians worked together in the process of transforming primary healthcare. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A longitudinal qualitative case study was conducted to explore the processes of change at the regional level and within seven communities across Northern British Columbia (BC), Canada. Over three years, 239 interviews were conducted with physicians, municipal leaders, health authority clinicians and leaders and other health and social service providers. Interviews and contextual documents were analyzed and interpreted to articulate how ongoing transformation has occurred.

findingsFour overall strategies with nine approaches were apparent. The strategies were partnering for innovation, keeping the focus on people in communities, taking advantage of opportunities for change and encouraging experimentation while managing risk. The strategies have bumped the existing system out of the status quo and are achieving transformation. Key components have been a commitment to a clear end-in-view, a focus on patients, families, and communities, and acting together over time. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study illuminates how partnering for primary healthcare transformation is messy and complicated but can create a foundation for whole system change.

Indexed as

Community-Institutional RelationsOrganizational InnovationBritish ColumbiaCooperative BehaviorHumansLongitudinal StudiesPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchIntegrationOrganizational innovationPartneringPrimary careQualitative researchRural health services

Identifiers

PMID31854955
PMCPMC7410305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.