Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31854076›Full record

ArticleAging cell2020

A genome-wide screen identifies genes that suppress the accumulation of spontaneous mutations in young and aged yeast cells.

Daniele Novarina, Georges E Janssens, Koen Bokern, Tim Schut, Noor C van Oerle, Hinke G Kazemier, Liesbeth M Veenhoff, Michael Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging cell, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The power of many: when genetics met yeasts and high-throughput.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  3. Transcription Regulatory ProteinmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Recent insights into the evolution of mutation rates in yeast.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniele NovarinaEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Georges E JanssensEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Koen BokernEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Tim SchutEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Noor C van OerleEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hinke G KazemierEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Liesbeth M VeenhoffEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Michael ChangEuropean Research Institute for the Biology of Ageing, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1706-3337
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 824.15.020Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 864.12.002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To ensure proper transmission of genetic information, cells need to preserve and faithfully replicate their genome, and failure to do so leads to genome instability, a hallmark of both cancer and aging. Defects in genes involved in guarding genome stability cause several human progeroid syndromes, and an age-dependent accumulation of mutations has been observed in different organisms, from yeast to mammals. However, it is unclear whether the spontaneous mutation rate changes during aging and whether specific pathways are important for genome maintenance in old cells. We developed a high-throughput replica-pinning approach to screen for genes important to suppress the accumulation of spontaneous mutations during yeast replicative aging. We found 13 known mutation suppression genes, and 31 genes that had no previous link to spontaneous mutagenesis, and all acted independently of age. Importantly, we identified PEX19, encoding an evolutionarily conserved peroxisome biogenesis factor, as an age-specific mutation suppression gene. While wild-type and pex19Δ young cells have similar spontaneous mutation rates, aged cells lacking PEX19 display an elevated mutation rate. This finding suggests that functional peroxisomes may be important to preserve genome integrity specifically in old cells.

Indexed as

Mutation RateAmino Acid Transport Systems, BasicCellular SenescenceDNA ReplicationFlap EndonucleasesGene OntologyGenetic TechniquesGenomic InstabilityMembrane ProteinsMutagenesisMutationMutation AccumulationNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSingle-Strand Specific DNA and RNA EndonucleasesAmino Acid Transport Systems, BasicCAN1 protein, S cerevisiaeFlap EndonucleasesMembrane ProteinsNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsNUP84 protein, S cerevisiaePEX19 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD10 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD27 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSingle-Strand Specific DNA and RNA Endonucleasesgenome stabilityhigh-throughput screenmutagenesismutation ratereplicative agingyeast

Identifiers

PMID31854076
PMCPMC6996960
OpenAlexW2995751339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.