ArticleEchocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)2020
Useful indices of thrombogenesis in the exclusion of intra-cardiac thrombus.
Article in Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Undetected intracardiac thrombus and subsequent embolism following cardiopulmonary bypass: a case report.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Management of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and atrial fibrillation: We are still far from precision medicine.World journal of cardiology · 2024Review
- Useful indices of thrombogenesis in the exclusion of intra-cardiac thrombus.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) can cause cardioembolic stroke, and effective clinical management is necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality. Currently, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the accepted standard to diagnose cardiogenic thromboemboli; however, a negative TEE does not eliminate the possibility of left atrial thrombus. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of supplementing the TEE with additional noninvasive markers to ensure thrombus absence.
methodsA prospective study was conducted on 59 patients who underwent TEE for suspected intra-cardiac thrombi. The TEE indications included acute ischemic stroke (45.7%) and AF or flutter (59.3%). D-dimer level and white blood cell counts were assessed.
resultsA negative D-dimer level (<200 ng/mL) excluded the presence of intra-cardiac thrombi. Groups with either negative (n = 14) or positive (n = 45) D-dimer levels had comparable clinical characteristics. Comparing positive D-dimer-level patients with thrombus (n = 7) and without thrombus (n = 33), patients with thrombus had reduced left atrial appendage (LAA) velocity (P = .0024), reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (P = .0263), increased neutrophil percent (P = .0261), decreased lymphocyte percent (P = .0216), and increased monocyte counts (P = .0220). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for thrombus diagnostics was larger for combinations of clinical and biochemical data than for each parameter individually.
conclusionsSupplementing the gold standard TEE with the analysis of LAA velocity, noninvasive LVEF, D-dimer, and hemostatic markers provided additional useful diagnostic information. Larger studies are needed to further validate the efficacy of supplementing the TEE to better assess patients for intra-cardiac thrombi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.