Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31853936›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2019

Unsupervised Machine Learning of Topics Documented by Nurses about Hospitalized Patients Prior to a Rapid-Response Event.

Zfania Tom Korach, Kenrick D Cato, Sarah A Collins, Min Jeoung Kang, Christopher Knaplund, Patricia C Dykes, Liqin Wang, Kumiko O Schnock, Jose P Garcia, Haomiao Jia and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zfania Tom KorachDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Kenrick D CatoSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States.
Sarah A CollinsSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States.
Min Jeoung KangDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Christopher KnaplundSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States.
Patricia C DykesDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Liqin WangDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Kumiko O SchnockDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Jose P GarciaDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Haomiao JiaSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States.
Frank ChangDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Jessica M SchwartzSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States.
Li ZhouDivision of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.

Funding

Reducing Health Disparities Through Informatics - Genomics SupplementT32NR007969 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SUZANNE BAKKEN, Rebecca Schnall · 2002 to 2026
$7.9M
Communicating Narrative Concerns Entered by RNs (CONCERN)R01NR016941 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Kenrick Dwain Cato, Sarah Collins Rossetti · 2017 to 2026
$6.7M
Reaching Communities through the Design of Information Visualizations (ReDIVis) Toolbox to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Uptake.P30NR016587 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BAKKEN, SUZANNE, SMALDONE, ARLENE M · 2016 to 2022
$4.3M
NINR NIH HHS P30 NR016587NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016941NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the hospital setting, it is crucial to identify patients at risk for deterioration before it fully develops, so providers can respond rapidly to reverse the deterioration. Rapid response (RR) activation criteria include a subjective component ("worried about the patient") that is often documented in nurses' notes and is hard to capture and quantify, hindering active screening for deteriorating patients.

objectivesWe used unsupervised machine learning to automatically discover RR event risk/protective factors from unstructured nursing notes.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we obtained nursing notes of hospitalized, nonintensive care unit patients, documented from 2015 through 2018 from Partners HealthCare databases. We applied topic modeling to those notes to reveal topics (clusters of associated words) documented by nurses. Two nursing experts named each topic with a representative Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) concept. We used the concepts along with vital signs and demographics in a time-dependent covariates extended Cox model to identify risk/protective factors for RR event risk.

resultsFrom a total of 776,849 notes of 45,299 patients, we generated 95 stable topics, of which 80 were mapped to 72 distinct SNOMED CT concepts. Compared with a model containing only demographics and vital signs, the latent topics improved the model's predictive ability from a concordance index of 0.657 to 0.720. Thirty topics were found significantly associated with RR event risk at a 0.05 level, and 11 remained significant after Bonferroni correction of the significance level to 6.94E-04, including physical examination (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.12), informing doctor (HR = 1.05, 95% CI, 1.03-1.08), and seizure precautions (HR = 1.08, 95% CI, 1.04-1.12).

conclusionUnsupervised machine learning methods can automatically reveal interpretable and informative signals from free-text and may support early identification of patients at risk for RR events.

Indexed as

DocumentationHospital Rapid Response TeamNursesUnsupervised Machine LearningData MiningHospitalizationHumansRisk AssessmentSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID31853936
PMCPMC6920051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.