Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31853887›Full record

ReviewJournal of endocrinological investigation2020

Molecular markers for the classification of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.

M Muzza, C Colombo, G Pogliaghi, O Karapanou, L Fugazzola

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Expression ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Substernal Goiter: From Definitions to Treatment.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M MuzzaDivision of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS IstitutoAuxologicoItaliano, 20149, Milan, Italy.
C ColomboDivision of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS IstitutoAuxologicoItaliano, 20149, Milan, Italy.
G PogliaghiDivision of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS IstitutoAuxologicoItaliano, 20149, Milan, Italy.
O KarapanouDepartment of Endocrinology, 401 Military Hospital, 11525, Athens, Greece.
L FugazzolaDivision of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, IRCCS IstitutoAuxologicoItaliano, 20149, Milan, Italy. laura.fugazzola@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5372-0982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis of indeterminate lesions of the thyroid is a challenge in cytopathology practice. Indeed, up to 30% of cases lack the morphological features needed to provide definitive classification. Molecular tests have been developed to assist in the diagnosis of these indeterminate cases. The first studies dealing with the preoperative molecular evaluation of FNA samples focused on the analysis of BRAF

conclusionsIn the present review, the most recent available versions of commercial molecular tests and of custom, non-commercial panels are described. Their characteristics and accuracy in the differential diagnosis of indeterminate nodules, namely Bethesda classes III (Atypical follicular lesion of undetermined significance, AUS/FLUS) and IV (Suspicious for follicular neoplasm, FN/SFN) are fully analyzed and discussed.

Indexed as

Cytological TechniquesDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesThyroid NoduleAfirma®AUS/FLUSBRAFFN/SFNIndeterminate nodulesThyroseq®

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.