Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31853861›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

Weight Regain and Diabetes Evolution After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Cohort Study with over 5 Years of Follow-Up.

D Capoccia, A Guida, F Coccia, G Guarisco, M Testa, F Leonetti, G Silecchia

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04480034 (Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery During Phase 2-3 Covid-19 Pandemic in Italy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04480034 unknown statusnot on this map

Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery During Phase 2-3 Covid-19 Pandemic in Italy: a Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Roma La SapienzaRan2020 to 2021Enrolled1,600ConditionsBariatric Surgery Candidate, Covid19, Complication of Surgical Procedure, Pneumonia, ViralArmsBariatric procedures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D CapocciaDepartment of Medico-surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy. danilacapoccia@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7792-3338
A GuidaDivision of General Surgery & Bariatric Center of Excellence IFSO EU, Latina, Italy.
F CocciaDepartment of Medico-surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
G GuariscoDepartment of Medico-surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
M TestaDepartment of Medico-surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
F LeonettiDepartment of Medico-surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
G SilecchiaDivision of General Surgery & Bariatric Center of Excellence IFSO EU, Latina, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA number of meta-analyses have demonstrated the effectiveness of bariatric surgery in improving morbid obesity and its associated co-morbidities. The aim of the study was to evaluate at long term a cohort of obese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) submitted to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) analyzing the incidence of weight regain (WR) and the impact of the WR on T2DM evolution.

methodsSeventy-eight morbid obese patients (54 females) with T2DM, aged 49.6 ± 8.7 years, weight 121.1 ± 24.4 kg, BMI 44.1 ± 7.2 kg/m

resultsIn the NR group, 54% show complete remission, 46% persistence, and no case of diabetes relapse; in the MR group, 59% show complete remission, 36% persistence, and 5% relapse; in the SR group, 61% show complete remission, 22% persistence, and 17% relapse. A statistically significant difference concerns the preoperative values of fasting glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, and duration of diabetes, major in the group with diabetes relapse (respectively, p = 0.002, p = 0.001, and p < 0.0001).

conclusionsThe results of this study showed no significant difference regarding the trend of diabetes remission comparing the "no regain," "mild regain," and "severe regain" groups and confirmed the importance of the duration of the illness and an early intervention towards surgical therapy.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2LaparoscopyObesity, MorbidAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight GainWeight LossObesitySleeve GastrectomyType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31853861
OpenAlexW2995158483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.