ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2020
Advancing neuro-oncology of glial tumors from big data and multidisciplinary studies.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumor size and treatment factors as correlates of 10-year mortality in grade III spinal ependymomas: a nationwide analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Leveraging TME features and multi-omics data with an advanced deep learning framework for improved Cancer survival prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A topic-based hierarchical publish/subscribe messaging middleware for COVID-19 detection in X-ray image and its metadata.Soft computing · 2023Article
- Distributed messaging and light streaming system for combating pandemics: A case study on spatial analysis of COVID-19 Geo-tagged Twitter dataset.Journal of ambient intelligence and humanized computing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMultidisciplinary studies for glial tumors has produced an enormous amount of information including imaging, histology, and a large cohort of molecular data (i.e. genomics, epigenomics, metabolomics, proteomics, etc.). The big data resources are made possible through open access that offers great potential for new biomarker or therapeutic intervention via deep-learning and/or machine learning for integrated multi-omics analysis. An equally important effort to define the hallmarks of glial tumors will also advance precision neuro-oncology and inform patient-specific therapeutics. This review summarizes past studies regarding tumor classification, hallmarks of cancer, and hypothetical mechanisms. Leveraging on advanced big data approaches and ongoing cross-disciplinary endeavors, this review also discusses how to integrate multiple layers of big data toward the goal of precision medicine.
resultsIn addition to basic research of cancer biology, the results from integrated multi-omics analysis will highlight biological processes and potential candidates as biomarkers or therapeutic targets. Ultimately, these collective resources built upon an armamentarium of accessible data can re-form clinical and molecular data to stratify patient-tailored therapy.
conclusionWe envision that a comprehensive understanding of the link between molecular signatures, tumor locations, and patients' history will identify a molecular taxonomy of glial tumors to advance the improvements in early diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.