Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31853826›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2020

Detection and quantification of synthetic cathinones and selected piperazines in hair by LC-MS/MS.

André Niebel, Franziska Krumbiegel, Sven Hartwig, Maria Kristina Parr, Michael Tsokos

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

André NiebelInstitute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Turmstraße 21 Haus N, 10559, Berlin, Germany. andre.niebel@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2813-1187
Franziska KrumbiegelInstitute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Turmstraße 21 Haus N, 10559, Berlin, Germany.
Sven HartwigInstitute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Turmstraße 21 Haus N, 10559, Berlin, Germany.
Maria Kristina ParrInstitute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Straße 2+4, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Michael TsokosInstitute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Turmstraße 21 Haus N, 10559, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New psychoactive substances (NPS)-such as synthetic cathinones and piperazines-are defined as substances designed to replicate the effects of traditional illegal drugs, including cocaine, ecstasy and amphetamines. These substances are known to potentially be much more potent than their analogs. In the past, there were many poisonings and deaths associated with NPS. Because of this, NPS identification and quantification have become more important in forensic toxicology. The present work aimed to develop, validate and apply a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method capable of detecting 35 synthetic cathinones and piperazines in hair samples. All target analytes were resolved in a 12 min run time and identified based on the quantifier ion, at least one product ion and the retention time. Depending on the analyte, the calibration curves were linear over a maximal range of 0.01-3 ng/mg. The limits of detection and quantification were within the ranges of 0.006-0.052 ng/mg and 0.008-0.095 ng/mg, respectively. The precision, bias and matrix effect were all within acceptable GTFCh thresholds and the method was free from interferences. The validated method was successfully used to identify synthetic cathinones and piperazines in authentic hair samples (n = 40) from forensic cases, demonstrating its suitability for the screening and quantification of a wide number of new stimulants in hair specimens.

Indexed as

AlkaloidsChromatography, LiquidForensic ToxicologyHairHumansIllicit DrugsLimit of DetectionPiperazinesPsychotropic DrugsSubstance Abuse DetectionTandem Mass SpectrometryAlkaloidscathinoneIllicit DrugsPiperazinesPsychotropic DrugsHairLC-MS/MSNew psychoactive substances (NPS)PiperazinesSynthetic cathinones

Identifiers

PMID31853826
OpenAlexW2995593754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.