ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2020
Detection and quantification of synthetic cathinones and selected piperazines in hair by LC-MS/MS.
Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Synthetic Cathinones and Phenylethylamine Derivatives Analysis in Hair: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Pooled it
- '3-Trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (TFMPP)' misidentification in aripiprazole-positive cases: a cautionary note.Forensic toxicology · 2026Article
- Article
- Recent advances in analysis of new psychoactive substances by means of liquid chromatography coupled with low-resolution tandem mass spectrometry.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Review
- Comparison of LC-MS and LC-DAD Methods of Detecting Abused Piperazine Designer Drugs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Rapid Targeted Method of Detecting Abused Piperazine Designer Drugs.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Hair analysis for New Psychoactive Substances (NPS): Still far from becoming the tool to study NPS spread in the community?Toxicology reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New psychoactive substances (NPS)-such as synthetic cathinones and piperazines-are defined as substances designed to replicate the effects of traditional illegal drugs, including cocaine, ecstasy and amphetamines. These substances are known to potentially be much more potent than their analogs. In the past, there were many poisonings and deaths associated with NPS. Because of this, NPS identification and quantification have become more important in forensic toxicology. The present work aimed to develop, validate and apply a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method capable of detecting 35 synthetic cathinones and piperazines in hair samples. All target analytes were resolved in a 12 min run time and identified based on the quantifier ion, at least one product ion and the retention time. Depending on the analyte, the calibration curves were linear over a maximal range of 0.01-3 ng/mg. The limits of detection and quantification were within the ranges of 0.006-0.052 ng/mg and 0.008-0.095 ng/mg, respectively. The precision, bias and matrix effect were all within acceptable GTFCh thresholds and the method was free from interferences. The validated method was successfully used to identify synthetic cathinones and piperazines in authentic hair samples (n = 40) from forensic cases, demonstrating its suitability for the screening and quantification of a wide number of new stimulants in hair specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.