Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31853807›Full record

ArticleJournal of immigrant and minority health2020

Antenatal Care Utilization and Obstetric and Newborn Outcomes Among Pregnant Refugees Attending a Specialized Refugee Clinic.

Mary Malebranche, Eric Norrie, Sylvia Hao, Garielle Brown, Rachel Talavlikar, Andrea Hull, Giselle De Vetten, Kara A Nerenberg, Amy Metcalfe, Gabriel Fabreau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immigrant and minority health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Receipt of adequate prenatal care for privately sponsored versus government-assisted refugees in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Association between Migrant Women's Legal Status and Prenatal Care Utilization in the PreCARE Cohort.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary MalebrancheDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. mary.malebranche@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4213-0041
Eric NorrieMosaic Refugee Health Clinic, Calgary, Canada.
Sylvia HaoUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Garielle BrownW21C Research and Innovation Centre, Calgary, Canada.
Rachel TalavlikarMosaic Refugee Health Clinic, Calgary, Canada.
Andrea HullMosaic Refugee Health Clinic, Calgary, Canada.
Giselle De VettenMosaic Refugee Health Clinic, Calgary, Canada.
Kara A NerenbergDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Amy MetcalfeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Gabriel FabreauDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the study is to characterize the antenatal care utilization and obstetric and newborn outcomes among refugee women at a specialized refugee clinic and determine whether these outcomes varied between refugees (government-assisted or privately-sponsored) and asylum seekers. This retrospective cohort study included women receiving antenatal care at a specialized refugee clinic between 2011 and 2016. Time from arrival to first clinic visit, Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index, and obstetric and newborn outcomes were examined, stratified by refugee category. Amongst 179 women, median time from arrival to first clinic visit was longer for asylum seekers (2.8 months, IQR 12.9) compared to government-assisted and privately-sponsored refugees (0.4 months, IQR 0.7, and 1.6 months, IQR 3.2, respectively; p < 0.01). A larger proportion of asylum seeking women received inadequate antenatal care. No difference was found in obstetric and newborn outcomes. Differences in antenatal care utilization between refugee categories suggest that barriers may remain for asylum seekers; however, obstetric and newborn outcomes were comparable amongst refugee categories.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePrenatal CareRefugeesAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCanadaDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancyRetrospective StudiesSelf ReportAntenatal/prenatal careHealth services researchMaternal and newborn healthRefugee health

Identifiers

PMID31853807
OpenAlexW2996683778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.