Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31853637›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2020

Auditory brainstem responses in the bat Carollia perspicillata: threshold calculation and relation to audiograms based on otoacoustic emission measurement.

Johannes Wetekam, Christin Reissig, Julio C Hechavarria, Manfred Kössl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Deviance Detection to Natural Stimuli in Population Responses of the Brainstem of Bats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of hearing in the big brown bat.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Johannes WetekamInstitute for Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Straße 13, 60439, Frankfurt, Germany.
Christin ReissigInstitute for Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Straße 13, 60439, Frankfurt, Germany.
Julio C HechavarriaInstitute for Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Straße 13, 60439, Frankfurt, Germany.
Manfred KösslInstitute for Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Goethe University, Max-von-Laue-Straße 13, 60439, Frankfurt, Germany. koessl@bio.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8094-6557
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An objective method to evaluate auditory brainstem-evoked responses (ABR) based on the root-mean-square (rms) amplitude of the measured signal and bootstrapping procedures was used to determine threshold curves (see Lv et al. in Med Eng Phys 29:191-198, 2007; Linnenschmidt and Wiegrebe in Hear Res 373:85-95, 2019). The rms values and their significance for threshold determination depended strongly on the filtering of the signal. Using the minimum threshold values obtained at three different low-frequency filter corner frequencies (30, 100, 300 Hz), ABR threshold curves were calculated. The course of the ABR thresholds was comparable to that of published DPOAE (distortion-product otoacoustic emission) thresholds based on a - 10 dB SPL threshold criterion for the 2f1-f2 emission (Schlenther et al. in J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15:695-705, 2014, frequency range 10-90 kHz). For frequencies between 20 and 80 kHz, which is the most sensitive part of the bat's audiogram, median thresholds ranged between 10 and 28 dB SPL, and the DPOAE thresholds ranged between 10 and 23 dB SPL. At frequencies below 20 kHz (5-20 kHz) and above 80 kHz (80-120 kHz), ABR thresholds increased by 20 dB/octave and 45 dB/octave, respectively. We conclude that the combination of objective threshold determination and multiple filtering of the signal gives reliable ABR thresholds comparable to cochlear threshold curves.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory ThresholdChiropteraCochleaEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFemaleMaleOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousABRAuditory systemCochleaDistortion productsEcholocation

Identifiers

PMID31853637
OpenAlexW2995381284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.