ArticleZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2020
[Impact of psychiatric disorders on the outcome of acute geriatric inpatient treatment: an exploratory investigation].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AIDEBMC geriatrics · 2026Trial
- Multimorbidity in old age and its impact on life results.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSystematic study results of geriatric inpatient treatment assessing the impact of psychiatric disorders on treatment outcome are so far missing. This exploratory study investigated the impact of dementia, depression and delirium on treatment outcome in a geriatric department, compared to those individuals without psychiatric symptoms at the beginning of treatment.
methodFrom January to June 2018 treatment data from geriatric inpatient records were retrospectively evaluated. Functional measurements (Barthel index, timed up and go test, Tinetti test and the De Morton mobility index) were assessed at the start of geriatric treatment and at discharge. A multivariate variance analysis (MANOVA) was used to calculate the possible impact of psychiatric disorders on functional improvement during treatment and to find out if there were significant differences between the four defined groups (dementia, depression, delirium and mentally sound).
resultsA total of 280 geriatric inpatients with an average age of 84 years, were included in this study and showed a noticeable prevalence of psychiatric disorders: dementia 29%, depression 27%, and delirium 15%. As expected, the patients in the sample showed a high level of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Functional improvement was present in each of the defined groups and significant differences between all groups were found. The results of MANOVA showed that none of the possible confounding variables, e.g. age, mini mental status examination (MMSE), degree of care, cognitive impairment, social status, gender and comorbid illness, had an important influence on the group results.
conclusionThis study of an acute geriatric department demonstrated that psychiatric disorders in these multimorbid, aged patients did not prevent functional improvement by treatment, showed significant differences during the course of treatment and outcome and compared to inpatients without psychiatric symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31853631What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.