Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31853598›Full record

Observational studyInternational urogynecology journal2020

"Voice your choice": a study of women's choice of surgery for primary stress urinary incontinence.

Lucy Dwyer, Emily Weaver, Azita Rajai, Samantha Cox, Fiona Reid

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International urogynecology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucy DwyerThe Warrell Unit, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Hathersage Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. Lucy.dwyer@mft.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0284-873X
Emily WeaverManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Hathersage Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Azita RajaiManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Hathersage Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Samantha CoxThe Warrell Unit, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Hathersage Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Fiona ReidThe Warrell Unit, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Hathersage Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Contura n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThis was an observational study aiming to determine factors which influence women's choice of surgery for primary stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

methodsTwo hundred twelve women undergoing a primary SUI procedure were recruited to this study from 12 hospitals in the north of England. After choosing a procedure, women were asked to complete a standardized semi-structured questionnaire about their health, demographics and a free text box to record factors important to them when choosing their procedure. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the impact of demographic, lifestyle or healthcare factors on women's decision-making. Thematic analysis of the free text data was performed to identify factors important for women when choosing a surgical procedure.

resultsSixty-four percent of women chose urethral bulking. There was no significant difference among age, BMI, smoking status or previous laparotomy between women choosing the four types of surgery. Women were less likely to choose urethral bulking if seen in a tertiary centre compared with a secondary centre (p < 001). Major themes in decision-making were efficacy, invasiveness, recovery, risk of complications, use of mesh, the clinician, the media, hierarchy of treatments and type of anaesthetic. Some women expressed a hierarchical approach to treatment.

conclusionsOur findings suggest decision-making is not influenced by patient factors such as age, BMI, smoking status or previous laparotomies. Women's choices are a complex mix of factors and not simply related to efficacy.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsUrinary Incontinence, StressAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDecision MakingEnglandFemaleHumansMiddle AgedUrethraUrologic Surgical ProceduresChoiceColposuspensionDecision makingFascial slingMid-urethral tapeSUIUrethral bulking

Identifiers

PMID31853598
PMCPMC7170975
OpenAlexW2996084545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.