ArticlePediatric cardiology2020
Arrhythmias in Children with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs).
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Umbilical venous catheter and peripherally inserted central catheter malposition and tip migration in neonates: A mixed methods cost analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- [A clinical study on the optimal placement depth for peripherally inserted central catheter through the great saphenous vein in preterm infants].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024Article
- Unusual Association of Diamond-Blackfan Anemia and Severe Sinus Bradycardia in a Six-Month-Old White Infant: A Case Report and Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Proper Depth of Percutaneous Central Venous Catheter via the Great Saphenous Vein for Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Single-Center, Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Article
- The relationship between the PICC tip position and weight gain, length growth of premature infants under ultrasonography: a correlation analysis study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Echocardiographic Determination of Percutaneous Central Venous Catheters in the Superior Vena Cava: A Prospective Cohort Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Machine Learning for Detection of Correct Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Tip Position from Radiology Reports in Infants.Applied clinical informatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To analyze the prevalence, types, and risk factors for cardiac arrhythmias associated with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in children. This is a case-control single center retrospective study. From 3180 PICCs inserted in children (< 18 years old) between 2009 and 2013, cases with new onset arrhythmias were identified. Demographics, type and timing of arrhythmias, and possible risk factors were analyzed. ECGs, rhythm strips, physicians' records, and anti-arrhythmic management were confirmatory. The level of the PICC's tip in the superior vena cava (SVC) or right atrium (RA) was ascertained from chest X-rays and counted in rib units (RU) and vertebra units (VU). Cases were matched (1:1 ratio) to controls by weight and date of insertion. Descriptive statistics were performed. A two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Thirty-one children (1%) developed arrhythmias, 16/31 (56%) were males, and 24/31 (77%) were < 1-year age. Arrhythmias were atrial 22 (71%), ventricular 4 (13%), and undetermined 5 (16%). Median PICC dwell time was 16 days. 14/31 (45%) cases and 9/31 (29%) controls had underlying structural heart disease. PICCs central tip position was lower among cases than controls (RU 6 vs 5). Odds Ratio for developing arrhythmia was 4.5 (95% CI 0.98-20.83) if the tip lays below 6.25RU. Arrhythmias were resolved with anti-arrhythmic agents in 52% (16/31) and with PICC exchange/manipulation in 32% (10/31) cases. Two children died unrelated to arrhythmia. Prevalence of arrhythmias associated with PICCs in children is low (1%). Arrhythmias are 4.5 times more likely when PICC's central tip position is deeper than 6.25RU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.