Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31853549›Full record

SynthesisJournal of animal science2020

Effect of low- and high-protein maternal diets during gestation on reproductive outcomes in the rat: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Peter K Ajuogu, Mitchell Wolden, James R McFarlane, Robert A Hart, Debra J Carlson, Tom Van der Touw, Neil A Smart

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter K AjuoguSchool of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Mitchell WoldenPhysical Therapy Program, University of Jamestown, Fargo, ND.
James R McFarlaneCentre for Bioactive Discovery in Health and Ageing, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Robert A HartSchool of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Debra J CarlsonSchool of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University Australia, North Rockhampton, QLD, Australia.
Tom Van der TouwSchool of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.
Neil A SmartSchool of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies with animal models have consistently demonstrated adverse health outcomes in offspring born following nutritional manipulation during gestation. However, the effects of gestational dietary protein modification on reproductive outcomes at birth are less clear. We, therefore, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials to determine whether high- or low-protein diets are associated with altered reproductive outcomes in a commonly studied species, the rat. Included studies were identified through a systematic search using electronic databases and manual literature review to identify randomized studies published between June 1972 and March 2019. Thirty-two studies were identified and used to analyze the effects of low- and high-protein gestational diets on litter size, litter weight, gestational weight gain, and gestational feed intake. The results indicate that low-protein diets significantly reduced litter weight (P < 0.00001) and gestational weight gain (P < 0.0006), but did not influence litter size (P = 0.62) or gestational feed intake (P = 0.25). In contrast, high-protein diets were found to reduce gestational feed intake (P = 0.004) but did not influence litter size (P = 0.56), litter weight (P = 0.22), or gestational weight gain (P = 0.35). The results suggest that low but not high-protein gestational diets alter reproductive outcomes at birth in rats.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsDietary ProteinsFemalePregnancyRatsReproductionDietary Proteinsgestationhigh- and low-protein dietmeta-analysisratsreproductionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31853549
PMCPMC6989889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.