ArticleNucleic acids research2020
Identification and characterization of occult human-specific LINE-1 insertions using long-read sequencing technology.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Active Human Transposable Elements: Long-Read Sequencing Technologies, Computational Analysis, and Implications for Human Disease.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Quantitative Control of Transposable Elements: From Genome Plasticity to Immune Regulatory Circuits.Cell biochemistry and function · 2026Review
- Fiber-TEnCATS reveals haplotype-specific chromatin accessibility and DNA methylation at human L1HS loci.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Leveraging long-read assemblies and machine learning to enhance short-read transposable element detection and genotyping.Genetics · 2026Article
- Article
- ANOMALY: a Snakemake pipeline for identifying NuMTs from long-read sequencing data.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Jumping in the human brain: A review on somatic transposition.Fundamental research · 2026Review
- Unraveling LINE-1 retrotransposition in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Molecular oncology · 2025Article
- Image-based DNA sequencing encoding for detecting low-mosaicism somatic mobile element insertions.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A personalized multi-platform assessment of somatic mosaicism in the human frontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Multi-platform framework for mapping somatic retrotransposition in human tissues.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- The Somatic Mosaicism across Human Tissues Network.Nature · 2025Review
- Transposable elements as genome regulators in normal and malignant haematopoiesis.Blood cancer journal · 2025Review
- Article
- Long-read sequencing for diagnosis of genetic myopathies.BMJ neurology open · 2025Review
- Multiple Displacement Amplification Facilitates SMRT Sequencing of Microscopic Animals and the Genome of the Gastrotrich Lepidodermella squamata (Dujardin 1841).Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Repeat-Rich Regions Cause False-Positive Detection of NUMTs: A Case Study in Amphibians Using an Improved Cane Toad Reference Genome.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Long Interspersed Element-1 (LINE-1) retrotransposition contributes to inter- and intra-individual genetic variation and occasionally can lead to human genetic disorders. Various strategies have been developed to identify human-specific LINE-1 (L1Hs) insertions from short-read whole genome sequencing (WGS) data; however, they have limitations in detecting insertions in complex repetitive genomic regions. Here, we developed a computational tool (PALMER) and used it to identify 203 non-reference L1Hs insertions in the NA12878 benchmark genome. Using PacBio long-read sequencing data, we identified L1Hs insertions that were absent in previous short-read studies (90/203). Approximately 81% (73/90) of the L1Hs insertions reside within endogenous LINE-1 sequences in the reference assembly and the analysis of unique breakpoint junction sequences revealed 63% (57/90) of these L1Hs insertions could be genotyped in 1000 Genomes Project sequences. Moreover, we observed that amplification biases encountered in single-cell WGS experiments led to a wide variation in L1Hs insertion detection rates between four individual NA12878 cells; under-amplification limited detection to 32% (65/203) of insertions, whereas over-amplification increased false positive calls. In sum, these data indicate that L1Hs insertions are often missed using standard short-read sequencing approaches and long-read sequencing approaches can significantly improve the detection of L1Hs insertions present in individual genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.