ArticleJournal of patient experience2019
Patients' Experiences of Participating Actively in Shared Decision-Making in Mental Care.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experiencing (Shared) Decision Making: Results from a Qualitative Study of People with Mental Illness and Their Family Members.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Experience of the patient regarding their safety in the hospital environment.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2023Article
- Experiences of shared decision making among patients with psychotic disorders in Norway: a qualitative study.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Use of Therapeutic Milieu Interventions in a Psychiatric Setting: A Systematic Review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients in mental care express a wish for more active participation. Shared decision-making is a way of increasing patient participation. There is lack of research into what the shared decision-making process means and how the patients can participate in and experience it in the context of mental care.
objectiveTo describe patient participation in shared decision-making in the context of indoor mental care.
methodA qualitative content analysis of data from in-depth interviews with 16 patients was performed.
resultsOne main theme was revealed:
conclusionPatients can participate actively in shared decision-making when the patients' and the mental health-care professionals' joint expertise is applied throughout their mental care. The patients experience thriving when participating actively in a complementary ensemble of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.