Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31853461›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2019

Learning-based deformable image registration: effect of statistical mismatch between train and test images.

Michael D Ketcha, Tharindu De Silva, Runze Han, Ali Uneri, Sebastian Vogt, Gerhard Kleinszig, Jeffrey H Siewerdsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael D KetchaJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Tharindu De SilvaJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2882-4920
Runze HanJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Ali UneriJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3419-1805
Sebastian VogtSiemens Healthcare XP Division, Erlangen, Germany.
Gerhard KleinszigSiemens Healthcare XP Division, Erlangen, Germany.
Jeffrey H SiewerdsenJohns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6644-1317

Funding

Intraoperative Imaging for Guidance, Patient Safety, and OR Quality AssuranceR01EB017226 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SIEWERDSEN, JEFFREY H · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) offer a promising means to achieve fast deformable image registration with accuracy comparable to conventional, physics-based methods. A persistent question with CNN methods, however, is whether they will be able to generalize to data outside of the training set. We investigated this question of mismatch between train and test data with respect to first- and second-order image statistics (e.g., spatial resolution, image noise, and power spectrum). A UNet-based architecture was built and trained on simulated CT images for various conditions of image noise (dose), spatial resolution, and deformation magnitude. Target registration error was measured as a function of the difference in statistical properties between the test and training data. Generally, registration error is minimized when the training data exactly match the statistics of the test data; however, networks trained with data exhibiting a diversity in statistical characteristics generalized well across the range of statistical conditions considered. Furthermore, networks trained on simulated image content with first- and second-order statistics selected to match that of real anatomical data were shown to provide reasonable registration performance on real anatomical content, offering potential new means for data augmentation. Characterizing the behavior of a CNN in the presence of statistical mismatch is an important step in understanding how these networks behave when deployed on new, unobserved data. Such characterization can inform decisions on whether retraining is necessary and can guide the data collection and/or augmentation process for training.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networksdeformable image registrationimage quality

Identifiers

PMID31853461
PMCPMC6916745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.