Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31853459›Full record

ArticleNeurophotonics2019

Exploring attentive task-based connectivity for screening attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder children: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Stephanie Sutoko, Yukifumi Monden, Tatsuya Tokuda, Takahiro Ikeda, Masako Nagashima, Tsukasa Funane, Hiroki Sato, Masashi Kiguchi, Atsushi Maki, Takanori Yamagata and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurophotonics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie SutokoHitachi, Ltd., Center for Exploratory Research, Research and Development Group, Hatoyama, Saitama, Japan.
Yukifumi MondenJichi Medical University, Department of Pediatrics, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Tatsuya TokudaChuo University, Research and Development Initiatives, Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro IkedaJichi Medical University, Department of Pediatrics, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Masako NagashimaJichi Medical University, Department of Pediatrics, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Tsukasa FunaneHitachi, Ltd., Center for Exploratory Research, Research and Development Group, Hatoyama, Saitama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6819-0320
Hiroki SatoHitachi, Ltd., Center for Exploratory Research, Research and Development Group, Hatoyama, Saitama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1364-2198
Masashi KiguchiHitachi, Ltd., Center for Exploratory Research, Research and Development Group, Hatoyama, Saitama, Japan.
Atsushi MakiHitachi, Ltd., Center for Exploratory Research, Research and Development Group, Hatoyama, Saitama, Japan.
Takanori YamagataJichi Medical University, Department of Pediatrics, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Ippeita DanChuo University, Research and Development Initiatives, Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitachi (Japan) · JPJichi Medical University Hospital · JPChuo University · JPJichi Medical University · JPShibaura Institute of Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Connectivity impairment has frequently been associated with the pathophysiology of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Although the connectivity of the resting state has mainly been studied, we expect the transition between baseline and task may also be impaired in ADHD children. Twenty-three typically developing (i.e., control) and 36 disordered (ADHD and autism-comorbid ADHD) children were subjected to connectivity analysis. Specifically, they performed an attention task, visual oddball, while their brains were measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy. The results of the measurements revealed three key findings. First, the control group maintained attentive connectivity, even in the baseline interval. Meanwhile, the disordered group showed enhanced bilateral intra- and interhemispheric connectivities while performing the task. However, right intrahemispheric connectivity was found to be weaker than those for the control group. Second, connectivity and activation characteristics might not be positively correlated with each other. In our previous results, disordered children lacked activation in the right middle frontal gyrus. However, within region connectivity of the right middle frontal gyrus was relatively strong in the baseline interval and significantly increased in the task interval. Third, the connectivity-based biomarker performed better than the activation-based biomarker in terms of screening. Activation and connectivity features were independently optimized and cross validated to obtain the best performing threshold-based classifier. The effectiveness of connectivity features, which brought significantly higher training accuracy than the optimum activation features, was confirmed (88% versus 76%). The optimum screening features were characterized by two trends: (1) strong connectivities of right frontal, left frontal, and left parietal lobes and (2) weak connectivities of left frontal, left parietal, and right parietal lobes in the control group. We conclude that the attentive task-based connectivity effectively shows the difference between control and disordered children and may represent pathological characteristics to be feasibly implemented as a supporting tool for clinical screening.

Indexed as

attentionattention-deficit/hyperactivity disordernear-infrared spectroscopyscreening tooltask-based connectivity

Identifiers

PMID31853459
PMCPMC6917048
OpenAlexW2996205053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.