Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31853404›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2019

Learned sensing: jointly optimized microscope hardware for accurate image classification.

Alex Muthumbi, Amey Chaware, Kanghyun Kim, Kevin C Zhou, Pavan Chandra Konda, Richard Chen, Benjamin Judkewitz, Andreas Erdmann, Barbara Kappes, Roarke Horstmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Artificial Intelligence in Label-Free Optical Imaging Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phenomic Imaging.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Deep learning in optical metrology: a review.Light, science & applications · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. J-MoDL: Joint Model-Based Deep Learning for Optimized Sampling and Reconstruction.IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alex MuthumbiSchool of Advanced Optical Technologies, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen 91052, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2909-2503
Amey ChawareDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham NC 27708, USA.
Kanghyun KimDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham NC 27708, USA.
Kevin C ZhouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham NC 27708, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0351-8812
Pavan Chandra KondaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham NC 27708, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7119-1949
Richard ChenY Combinator Research, San Francisco, CA 94103, USA.
Benjamin JudkewitzNeuroCure Cluster of Excellence, Charitè Universitätsmedizin and Humboldt University, Berlin 10117, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-3869
Andreas ErdmannSchool of Advanced Optical Technologies, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen 91052, Germany.
Barbara KappesDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University, Erlangen 91054, Germany.
Roarke HorstmeyerDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham NC 27708, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its invention, the microscope has been optimized for interpretation by a human observer. With the recent development of deep learning algorithms for automated image analysis, there is now a clear need to re-design the microscope's hardware for specific interpretation tasks. To increase the speed and accuracy of automated image classification, this work presents a method to co-optimize how a sample is illuminated in a microscope, along with a pipeline to automatically classify the resulting image, using a deep neural network. By adding a "physical layer" to a deep classification network, we are able to jointly optimize for specific illumination patterns that highlight the most important sample features for the particular learning task at hand, which may not be obvious under standard illumination. We demonstrate how our learned sensing approach for illumination design can automatically identify malaria-infected cells with up to 5-10% greater accuracy than standard and alternative microscope lighting designs. We show that this joint hardware-software design procedure generalizes to offer accurate diagnoses for two different blood smear types, and experimentally show how our new procedure can translate across different experimental setups while maintaining high accuracy.

Identifiers

PMID31853404
PMCPMC6913384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.