Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31853171›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis for Central Retinal Artery Occlusion.

Navid Hakim, Jamil Hakim

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Thrombolysis for Central Retinal Artery Occlusion in 2020: Time Is Vision!Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Progress in central retinal artery occlusion: a narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Visual complications after coil embolization of internal carotid artery aneurysms at the ophthalmic segment.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Navid HakimSt. Pauls Eye Department, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8624-1838
Jamil HakimOphthalmology Department, Queen Mary's Hospital Sidcup, Sidcup, UK.
Queen Mary's Hospital Sidcup · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCentral retinal artery occlusion is an ophthalmic emergency which typically causes acute, painless visual loss. Several conservative treatment options are practiced with little benefit. Thrombolysis as a therapeutic option has gathered interest as well as controversy. This paper aims at reviewing the relevant literature to assess the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute central retinal artery occlusion.

methodsA review of the literature was conducted. Keywords included "intra-arterial thrombolysis" or "intra-arterial fibrinolysis" in combination with "central retinal artery occlusion" or "CRAO". A Cochrane Database search was performed for randomised control trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses using the same keywords.

resultsTwenty-eight studies were identified which included case reports, case series, case-control studies and 1 randomised control trial: the European Assessment Group for Lysis in the Eye Study. Improvement in vision was measured using different methods and at different time points. The findings of these studies generally favour an effect towards intra-arterial thrombolysis however there are many limitations. Additionally, the European Assessment Group for Lysis in the Eye Study showed lack of effect in intra-arterial thrombolysis vs conservative measures.

conclusionCurrent evidence is not sufficient to recommend intra-arterial thrombolysis due to the variability of visual improvement within retrospective studies, heterogeneity in treatment regimens between studies and adverse effects. Intra-arterial thrombolysis may have a role in patients presenting early, particularly if they have monocular vision, after discussion of the risks and benefits. Further high-quality trials assessing the clinical efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolysis may shed more light on this topic.

Indexed as

central retinal artery occlusionfibrinolysisintra-arterialthrombolysis

Identifiers

PMID31853171
PMCPMC6916701
OpenAlexW2994750807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.