Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31853142›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy

Evaluation of a Novel Audit Tool for Medication Reconciliation at Hospital Discharge.

Anne Holbrook, Heather Bannerman, Amna Ahmed, Michael Georgy, J Tiger Liu, Sue Troyan, Alice Watt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne Holbrook, MD, PharmD, MSc, FRCPC, is with the Division of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology and the Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Heather Bannerman, MD, PharmD, BScPhm, is with the Internal Medicine Residency Program, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Amna Ahmed, MD, is with the Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Michael Georgy, MBBCh, is a student currently affiliated with the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
J Tiger Liu, MSc, was, at the time of this study, a student with the eHealth Master's Program, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
Sue Troyan, BA, is with the Division of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, St Joseph's Hospital Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario.
Alice Watt, BSc(Pharm), RPh, is with the Institute for Safe Medication Practices Canada, Toronto, Ontario.
McMaster University · CARoyal College of Surgeons of England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDischarge medication reconciliation (MedRec) is designed to reduce medication errors and inform patients and key postdischarge providers, but it has been difficult to implement routinely in Canadian hospitals.

objectivesTo evaluate and optimize a new discharge MedRec quality audit tool and to use it at 3 urban teaching hospitals.

methodsThe discharge MedRec quality audit tool, developed by the Canadian Patient Safety Institute and the Institute for Safe Medication Practices Canada, was assessed and modified to improve comprehensiveness, clarity, and quality. The modified tool was then used to evaluate the quality of the discharge MedRec process for adult patients discharged to home from the general internal medicine service at 3 academic hospitals. Postdischarge telephone interviews were conducted with consenting patients, their community pharmacists, and their family doctors.

resultsThe audit tool required modification to include aspects of admission MedRec, high-risk medication discrepancies, and direct communication of discharge MedRec to key follow-up providers. Thirty-five patients (mean age 67.7 years, standard deviation [SD] 18.0 years; 17 [49%] women), with a mean of 8.8 (SD 4.5) prescribed medications at discharge, participated in the discharge MedRec evaluation. Documentation of any discharge MedRec was found for only 1 patient (3%), and no discharge MedRec was carried out by pharmacists. Postdischarge follow-up interviews elicited major gaps in communication with community pharmacists and with family physicians, which could lead to serious medication errors.

conclusionsThe modified audit tool was useful for identifying gaps in the quality of discharge MedRec.

Indexed as

accreditationdischarge prescriptionhospital dischargemedication errormedication reconciliationquality improvement

Identifiers

PMID31853142
PMCPMC6910843
OpenAlexW2995630287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.