Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31852908›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

CETSA-based target engagement of taxanes as biomarkers for efficacy and resistance.

Anette Langebäck, Smaranda Bacanu, Henriette Laursen, Lisanne Mout, Takahiro Seki, Sigrun Erkens-Schulze, Anderson Daniel Ramos, Anna Berggren, Yihai Cao, Johan Hartman and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Current Advances in CETSA.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Anette LangebäckDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum, Solna, 171 64, Sweden.
Smaranda BacanuDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum, Solna, 171 64, Sweden.
Henriette LaursenDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum, Solna, 171 64, Sweden.
Lisanne MoutDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Takahiro SekiDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, 171 65, Sweden.
Sigrun Erkens-SchulzeDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anderson Daniel RamosDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum, Solna, 171 64, Sweden.
Anna BerggrenDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum, Solna, 171 64, Sweden.
Yihai CaoDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, 171 65, Sweden.
Johan HartmanDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum, Solna, 171 64, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6500-8527
Wytske van WeerdenDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jonas BerghDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum, Solna, 171 64, Sweden.
Pär NordlundDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum, Solna, 171 64, Sweden. par.nordlund@ki.se.
Sara LööfDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, BioClinicum, Solna, 171 64, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEErasmus University Rotterdam · NLAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of taxanes has for decades been crucial for treatment of several cancers. A major limitation of these therapies is inherent or acquired drug resistance. A key to improved outcome of taxane-based therapies is to develop tools to predict and monitor drug efficacy and resistance in the clinical setting allowing for treatment and dose stratification for individual patients. To assess treatment efficacy up to the level of drug target engagement, we have established several formats of tubulin-specific Cellular Thermal Shift Assays (CETSAs). This technique was evaluated in breast and prostate cancer models and in a cohort of breast cancer patients. Here we show that taxanes induce significant CETSA shifts in cell lines as well as in animal models including patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Furthermore, isothermal dose response CETSA measurements allowed for drugs to be rapidly ranked according to their reported potency. Using multidrug resistant cancer cell lines and taxane-resistant PDX models we demonstrate that CETSA can identify taxane resistance up to the level of target engagement. An imaging-based CETSA format was also established, which in principle allows for taxane target engagement to be accessed in specific cell types in complex cell mixtures. Using a highly sensitive implementation of CETSA, we measured target engagement in fine needle aspirates from breast cancer patients, revealing a range of different sensitivities. Together, our data support that CETSA is a robust tool for assessing taxane target engagement in preclinical models and clinical material and therefore should be evaluated as a prognostic tool during taxane-based therapies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBiopsy, Fine-NeedleBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHeterograftsHumansMaleMCF-7 CellsPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsTaxoidsTubulinBiomarkers, TumorTaxoidsTubulin

Identifiers

PMID31852908
PMCPMC6920357
OpenAlexW2996401057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.