Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31852886›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2019

Reduced visual evoked potential amplitude in autism spectrum disorder, a variability effect?

Klara Kovarski, Joëlle Malvy, Raoul K Khanna, Sophie Arsène, Magali Batty, Marianne Latinus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The role of single trial variability in event related potentials in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Visual Responsivity in Autism: Measuring Visual Responses in Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults Using Psychophysics, fMRI, and EEG.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Variability in sensory processing and evoked potentials in Rett syndrome.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Parsing evoked and induced gamma response differences in Autism: A visual evoked potential study.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Klara KovarskiUMR 1253, iBrain, Université de Tours, Inserm, Tours, France. klara.kovarski@parisdescartes.fr.
Joëlle MalvyUMR 1253, iBrain, Université de Tours, Inserm, Tours, France.
Raoul K KhannaUMR 1253, iBrain, Université de Tours, Inserm, Tours, France.
Sophie ArsèneCHRU de Tours, Département d'Ophtalmologie, Tours, France.
Magali BattyUniversité de Toulouse, CERPPS, Toulouse, France.
Marianne LatinusUMR 1253, iBrain, Université de Tours, Inserm, Tours, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4406-2962

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atypical sensory behaviours represent a core symptom of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Investigating early visual processing is crucial to deepen our understanding of higher-level processes. Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to pattern-reversal checkerboards were recorded in ASD children and age-matched controls. Peak analysis of the P100 component and two types of single-trial analyses were carried out. P100 amplitude was reduced in the ASD group, consistent with previous reports. The analysis of the proportion of trials with a positive activity in the latency range of the P100, measuring inter-trial (in)consistency, allowed identifying two subgroups of ASD participants: the first group, as control children, showed a high inter-trial consistency, whereas the other group showed an inter-trial inconsistency. Analysis of median absolute deviation of single-trial P100 (st-P100) latencies revealed an increased latency variability in the ASD group. Both single-trial analyses revealed increased variability in a subset of children with ASD. To control for this variability, VEPs were reconstructed by including only positive trials or trials with homogeneous st-P100 latencies. These control analyses abolished group differences, confirming that the reduced P100 amplitude results from increased inter-trial variability in ASD. This increased variability in ASD supports the neural noise theory. The existence of subgroups in ASD suggests that the neural response variability is not a genuine characteristic of the entire autistic spectrum, but rather characterized subgroups of children. Exploring the relationship between sensory responsiveness and inter-trial variability could provide more precise bioclinical profiles in children with ASD, and complete the functional diagnostic crucial for the development of individualized therapeutical projects.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderChildChild, PreschoolElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMalePattern Recognition, Visual

Identifiers

PMID31852886
PMCPMC6920480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.