Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31852722›Full record

ArticleGenome research2020

Characterizing the nuclear and cytoplasmic transcriptomes in developing and mature human cortex uncovers new insight into psychiatric disease gene regulation.

Amanda J Price, Taeyoung Hwang, Ran Tao, Emily E Burke, Anandita Rajpurohit, Joo Heon Shin, Thomas M Hyde, Joel E Kleinman, Andrew E Jaffe, Daniel R Weinberger

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Divergent landscapes of A-to-I editing in postmortem and living human brain.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. LAFITE Reveals the Complexity of Transcript Isoforms in Subcellular Fractions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda J PriceLieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7352-3732
Taeyoung HwangLieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Ran TaoLieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Emily E BurkeLieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Anandita RajpurohitLieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Joo Heon ShinLieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Thomas M HydeLieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Joel E KleinmanLieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Andrew E JaffeLieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6886-1454
Daniel R WeinbergerLieber Institute for Brain Development, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USLieber Institute for Brain Development · US

Funding

Decomposing cell type-specific marks in post-mortem human brain studiesR21MH105853 · NIMH · LIEBER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI JAFFE, ANDREW ELLIS, WEINBERGER, DANIEL · 2015 to 2016
$509k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH105853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcriptome compartmentalization by the nuclear membrane provides both stochastic and functional buffering of transcript activity in the cytoplasm, and has recently been implicated in neurodegenerative disease processes. Although many mechanisms regulating transcript compartmentalization are also prevalent in brain development, the extent to which subcellular localization differs as the brain matures has yet to be addressed. To characterize the nuclear and cytoplasmic transcriptomes during brain development, we sequenced both RNA fractions from homogenate prenatal and adult human postmortem cortex using poly(A)+ and Ribo-Zero library preparation methods. We find that while many genes are differentially expressed by fraction and developmental expression changes are similarly detectable in nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA, the compartmented transcriptomes become more distinct as the brain matures, perhaps reflecting increased utilization of nuclear retention as a regulatory strategy in adult brain. We examined potential mechanisms of this developmental divergence including alternative splicing, RNA editing, nuclear pore composition, RNA-binding protein motif enrichment, and RNA secondary structure. Intron retention is associated with greater nuclear abundance in a subset of transcripts, as is enrichment for several splicing factor binding motifs. Finally, we examined disease association with fraction-regulated gene sets and found nuclear-enriched genes were also preferentially enriched in gene sets associated with neurodevelopmental psychiatric disorders. These results suggest that although gene-level expression is globally comparable between fractions, nuclear retention of transcripts may play an underappreciated role in developmental regulation of gene expression in brain, particularly in genes whose dysregulation is related to neuropsychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseTranscriptomeAge FactorsAlternative SplicingCell NucleusCerebral CortexComputational BiologyCytoplasmGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGenetic Association StudiesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMental DisordersMolecular Sequence AnnotationRNA Editing

Identifiers

PMID31852722
PMCPMC6961577
OpenAlexW2995289957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.