Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31852708›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Patients' perceptions of continuity of care across primary care level and emergency departments in Belgium: cross-sectional survey.

Marlene Karam, Anne-Sophie Lambert, Jean Macq

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marlene KaramFaculty of Public Health, Institute of Health and Society, Catholic University of Louvain Health Sciences Sector, Brussels, Belgium marlene.karam@uclouvain.be.ORCID 0000-0001-5277-2000
Anne-Sophie LambertFaculty of Public Health, Institute of Health and Society, Catholic University of Louvain Health Sciences Sector, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean MacqFaculty of Public Health, Institute of Health and Society, Catholic University of Louvain Health Sciences Sector, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess patients' perceptions of continuity of care (COC) across primary care level and emergency departments (EDs) and to identify contextual and individual factors that influence this perception.

designCross-sectional multicentre survey.

settingFive EDs in Brussels and Wallonia.

participants501 adult patients referred to the ED by their primary care physician (PCP). Patients with cognitive impairment or in critical condition were excluded.

resultsPatients perceived high levels of the three types of COC. On an individual level, older patients showed a perception of higher levels of continuity. Lower levels of informational and management continuity were observed among patients suffering from chronic diseases and patients with a high level of education. Patients also perceived a redundancy of medical exams, in parallel to a high degree of accessibility between care levels. On an organisational level, three structural factors were identified as barriers to COC, namely, ED workload, suboptimal sharing information system and the current fee-for-service payment system that encourages competition and hinders coordination between actors.

conclusionBelgian healthcare services seem satisfying for patients and easily accessible. However, efforts need to be directed towards improving their efficiency. A stronger primary care level is also needed to benefit the healthcare system by reducing overuse of emergency services. On the individual level, a more enhanced patient-centred approach could be beneficial in improving patients experience of care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBelgiumContinuity of Patient CareCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultilevel AnalysisPatient Satisfactioncontinuity of careemergency departmentsprimary care

Identifiers

PMID31852708
PMCPMC6936975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.