Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31852702›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Protocol for developing a core outcome set for evaluating school-based physical activity interventions in primary schools.

Kimberley A Foley, Tishya Venkatraman, Bina Ram, Louisa Ells, Esther van Sluijs, Dougal S Hargreaves, Felix Greaves, Mansour Taghavi Azar Sharabiani, Russell M Viner, Alex Bottle and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberley A FoleyDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3664-8100
Tishya VenkatramanDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6171-2384
Bina RamDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0023-1573
Louisa EllsCentre for Public Health Research, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0559-4832
Esther van SluijsMRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9141-9082
Dougal S HargreavesDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0722-9847
Felix GreavesDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9393-3122
Mansour Taghavi Azar SharabianiDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3808-277X
Russell M VinerPopulation, Policy and Practice Research Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3047-2247
Alex BottleDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9978-2011
Sonia SaxenaDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK s.saxena@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3787-2083
Imperial College London · GBPublic Health England · GBTeesside University · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_UU_12015/7Medical Research Council MR/K023187/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrimary school-based physical activity interventions, such as The Daily Mile initiative, have the potential to increase children's physical activity levels over time, which is associated with a variety of health benefits. Comparing interventions or combining results of several studies of a single intervention is challenging because previous studies have examined different outcomes or used different measures that are not feasible or relevant for researchers in school settings. The development and implementation of a core outcome set (COS) for primary school-based physical activity interventions would ensure outcomes important to those involved in implementing and evaluating interventions are standardised. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Our aim is to develop a COS for studies of school-based physical activity interventions. We will achieve this by undertaking a four-stage process:(1) identify a list of outcomes assessed in studies through a systematic review of international literature; (2) establish domains from these outcomes to produce questionnaire items; (3) prioritise outcomes through a two-stage Delphi survey with four key stakeholder groups (researchers, public health professionals, educators and parents), where stakeholders rate the importance of each outcome on a 9-point Likert scale (consensus that the outcomes should be included in the COS will be determined as 70% or more of all stakeholders scoring the outcome 7%-9% and 15% or less scoring 1 to 3); (4) achieve consensus on a final COS in face-to-face meetings with a sample of stakeholders and primary school children. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We have received ethical approval from Imperial College London (ref: 19IC5428). The results of this study will be disseminated via conference presentations/public health meetings, peer-reviewed publications and through appropriate media channels. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative (COMET) number: 1322.

Indexed as

ExerciseResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesConsensusConsensus Statements as TopicHumansPhysical Education and TrainingSchool Health ServicesSchoolsStakeholder Participationconsensus methodscore outcomes setdelphi techniquephysical activity interventionsprimary schools

Identifiers

PMID31852702
PMCPMC6937029
OpenAlexW2995381611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.