Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31852701›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Indications and outcomes of paediatric tracheotomy: a descriptive study using a Japanese claims database.

Kayoko Mizuno, Masato Takeuchi, Yo Kishimoto, Koji Kawakami, Koichi Omori

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Pediatric tracheotomy: clinical analysis of 95 cases with different etiology].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2022
    Article
  13. Clinical epidemiology and pharmacoepidemiology studies with real-world databases.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Trend of Pediatric Tracheostomy in Taiwan: A Population-Based Survey from 2000 to 2019.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kayoko MizunoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Masato TakeuchiDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Department of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
Yo KishimotoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Koji KawakamiDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Department of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan kawakami.koji.4e@kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-7477-4071
Koichi OmoriDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the incidence of and indications for paediatric tracheotomy to clarify the disease burden relevant to tracheotomy in a population-based context.

designA descriptive analysis of a retrospective cohort.

settingThis study utilised a nationwide claims database in Japan constructed by JMDC (Tokyo, Japan). The database includes claims data for approximately 3.75 million insured persons (approximately 3.1% of the population of Japan) comprising mainly company employees and their family members.

participantsWe identified children registered to have undergone tracheotomy from 2005 to 2017 among about 1.2 million children aged 0-15 years.

main outcome measuresThe characteristics of the study population, and indications for tracheotomy, duration of hospital stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of tracheotomy dependence, complications related to tracheotomy and death were assessed. When there were multiple indications, classification for a child into multiple groups was allowed.

resultsThe study included 215 children (120 males, 56%). The median age at tracheotomy was 0.8 years. The most common age at tracheotomy was less than 12 months (n=127, 59.1%). The most common indications for tracheotomy were chronic lung disease (n=79, 36.7%), followed by neuromuscular disease (n=77, 35.8%), cardiovascular disease (n=53, 24.3%), upper airway obstruction (n=43, 20%), premature birth and related conditions (n=34, 15.8%), trauma (n=16, 7.4%), prolonged ventilation due to other causes (n=12, 5.6%) and malignancy (n=9, 4.2%). The median duration of tracheotomy dependence was 17.2 months. During the follow-up period, decannulation was achieved in 84 children (39.1%), and the median time from tracheotomy to decannulation was 12.0 months.

conclusionsMost paediatric tracheotomies were performed due to chronic underlying diseases, and the mean duration of tracheotomy dependence was nearly 1-½ years. The long-term duration of tracheotomy dependence might have some impacts on patients' physical and mental development and the quality of life.

Indexed as

TracheotomyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualDevice RemovalFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantJapanLength of StayLogistic ModelsMaleQuality of LifeRespiration, Artificialcannulationdecannulationindicationpediatric tracheotomy

Identifiers

PMID31852701
PMCPMC6937105
OpenAlexW2995795362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.