Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31852485›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019

Intramedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures of proximal femur: a consecutive series of 323 patients treated with two devices.

Pompeo Catania, Daniele Passaretti, Giorgio Montemurro, Simone Ripanti, Stefano Carbone, Vittorio Candela, Michele Carnovale, Stefano Gumina, Francecsco Pallotta

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The factors that affect blood loss in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail in the elderly.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pompeo CataniaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Daniele PassarettiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, C.T.O. Hospital, Rome, Italy. passaretti.md@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6221-7027
Giorgio MontemurroDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Simone RipantiDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Stefano CarboneDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Clinica San Feliciano, Rome, Italy.
Vittorio CandelaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Sapienza University of Rome, ICOT, Latina, Italy.
Michele CarnovaleDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Sapienza University of Rome, ICOT, Latina, Italy.
Stefano GuminaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Sapienza University of Rome, ICOT, Latina, Italy.
Francecsco PallottaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITCTO Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPertrochanteric fractures (PFs) frequently affect the lower limb of osteoporotic patients and represent an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we have compared functional and radiological results and complications of patients affected by PFs treated with two intramedullary proximal femoral nails. MATERIALS: We enrolled 323 subjects with PFs, classified according to AO/OTA system as 31.A1 (pertrochanteric simple) and 31.A2 (pertrochanteric multifragmentary). Patients were divided into two groups according to the osteosynthesis devices: group A, Elos-Intrauma® nail (155 cases) and group B, Gamma 3-Stryker® nail (168 cases). Pre-operatively, the baseline characteristics of each patient (gender, age, weight and BMI) were collected. Intraoperative blood loss, subjective pain by visual analogue scale (VAS), esthetic satisfaction, functional scores of the hip by Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were noted. The post-operative degree of fracture reduction was assessed. Each patient had a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

resultsThe study group was composed of 106 male and 217 female with an average age of 85.4 (range, 65-90, standard deviation (SD) 5.95) years. No statistical differences about sex and age distribution were noted between the two groups. Group A reported lower intraoperative blood loss, 45 ml vs 51 ml, respectively (p < 0.001). There was not any statistical difference about operative time. Group A had a better reduction of fracture (p = 0.0347). The greatest difference was detectable comparing subgroups 31.A2 (p = 0.032). There were no statistical differences about complication frequency and the overall rate was 25% (80 cases). Finally, there was no difference in terms of VAS, HHS, and WOMAC score between the two groups on each follow-up. Patients of group A showed a higher subjective satisfaction index at 1 post-operative year, 7.42 (SD 1.19) vs 6.45 (SD 1.35) of group B (p < 0.001).

conclusionElos® nail is a reliable device on a short-term follow-up and represents an alternative choice to the Gamma 3® nail, a well-known and appreciated system for over 25 years.

Indexed as

Bone NailsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHip FracturesHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignTreatment OutcomeElderly fracture treatmentElos nailFemur intramedullary nailingGamma nailPertrochanteric fractures

Identifiers

PMID31852485
PMCPMC6921538
OpenAlexW2995949206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.