Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31852478›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2019

Maternal milk and fecal microbes guide the spatiotemporal development of mucosa-associated microbiota and barrier function in the porcine neonatal gut.

Hongbin Liu, Xiangfang Zeng, Guolong Zhang, Chengli Hou, Ning Li, Haitao Yu, Lijun Shang, Xiaoya Zhang, Paolo Trevisi, Feiyun Yang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Spatiotemporal dynamics of mucosa-associatedAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Hongbin LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Beijing Key Laboratory of Bio-Feed Additives, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Xiangfang ZengState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Beijing Key Laboratory of Bio-Feed Additives, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Guolong ZhangDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Chengli HouInstitute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ning LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Beijing Key Laboratory of Bio-Feed Additives, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Haitao YuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Beijing Key Laboratory of Bio-Feed Additives, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Lijun ShangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Beijing Key Laboratory of Bio-Feed Additives, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoya ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Beijing Key Laboratory of Bio-Feed Additives, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Paolo TrevisiDepartment of Agricultural and Food Science, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Feiyun YangChongqing Academy of Animal Science, Chongqing, China.
Zuohua LiuChongqing Academy of Animal Science, Chongqing, China.
Shiyan QiaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Beijing Key Laboratory of Bio-Feed Additives, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China. qiaoshiyan@cau.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1133-1393
State Key Laboratory of Animal NutritionChongqing Academy of Animal Science · CNInstitute of Food Science and Technology · CNOklahoma State University · USShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology · CNUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe early-life microbiota exerts a profound and lifelong impact on host health. Longitudinal studies in humans have been informative but are mostly based on the analysis of fecal samples and cannot shed direct light on the early development of mucosa-associated intestinal microbiota and its impact on GI function. Using piglets as a model for human infants, we assess here the succession of mucosa-associated microbiota across the intestinal tract in the first 35 days after birth.

resultsAlthough sharing a similar composition and predicted functional profile at birth, the mucosa-associated microbiome in the small intestine (jejunum and ileum) remained relatively stable, while that of the large intestine (cecum and colon) quickly expanded and diversified by day 35. Among detected microbial sources (milk, vagina, areolar skin, and feces of sows, farrowing crate, and incubator), maternal milk microbes were primarily responsible for the colonization of the small intestine, contributing approximately 90% bacteria throughout the first 35 days of the neonatal life. Although maternal milk microbes contributed greater than 90% bacteria to the large intestinal microbiota of neonates upon birth, their presence gradually diminished, and they were replaced by maternal fecal microbes by day 35. We found strong correlations between the relative abundance of specific mucosa-associated microbes, particularly those vertically transmitted from the mother, and the expression levels of multiple intestinal immune and barrier function genes in different segments of the intestinal tract.

conclusionWe revealed spatially specific trajectories of microbial colonization of the intestinal mucosa in the small and large intestines, which can be primarily attributed to the colonization by vertically transmitted maternal milk and intestinal microbes. Additionally, these maternal microbes may be involved in the establishment of intestinal immune and barrier functions in neonates. Our findings strengthen the notion that studying fecal samples alone is insufficient to fully understand the co-development of the intestinal microbiota and immune system and suggest the possibility of improving neonatal health through the manipulation of maternal microbiota.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIntestinal MucosaIntestinesMilkSus scrofaEarly lifeImmunologic maturationMaternal microbial transmissionMicrobiota-host interactionMucosal microbiotaSpatiotemporal colonization

Identifiers

PMID31852478
PMCPMC6921401
OpenAlexW2995192586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.