Observational studyMedicine2019
The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between stent length and number and the risk of in-stent restenosis in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Risk Factors and Incidence for In-Stent Restenosis with Drug-Eluting Stent: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Influencing Factors and Prediction Model Construction of Anxiety and Depression in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Undergoing In-Stent Restenosis.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Association between Triglyceride-glucose index and coronary artery in-stent restenosis: A case-control study in an Iranian patient population.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2026Article
- Diabetes and restenosis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2022Review
- A prediction model based on platelet parameters, lipid levels, and angiographic characteristics to predict in-stent restenosis in coronary artery disease patients implanted with drug-eluting stents.Lipids in health and disease · 2021Article
- Calcification patterns in femoral and carotid atheromatous plaques: A comparative morphometric study.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most effective therapies for coronary artery disease, but stent restenosis remains an important clinical challenge. The studies about the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis were limited.The purpose was to identify the independent effect of the number of stents on stent restenosis.A retrospective cohort study of data reuse.From July 2009 to August 2011, a total of 2338 cases met the inclusion and exclusion criteria.The univariate analysis showed that the number of stents was a risk of stent restenosis, the OR value was 1.30 (95% CI:1.15 to 1.47, P < .001). The multi-factor regression analysis also showed that the number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis, the adjusted OR value was 1.38 (95% CI: 1.15 to 1.66, P < .001).Compared with 1-2 stents, the adjusted OR values of 3-5 stents and more than 6 stents were respectively 2.20 (95% CI: 1.24 to 3.90, P = .007) and 5.33 (95% CI: 1.89 to 15.08, P = .002), and the trend adjusted OR values was 2.26 (95% CI: 1.43 to 3.59, P < .001).The subgroup analysis of multi-factor regression analysis showed that when patients with the following conditions: 50 < Age, female, non-DES or SES, the risk of stent restenosis increased obviously.The number of stents was an independent risk of stent restenosis in patients undergoing PCI, especially for patients with the following conditions: 2<the number of stents, 50 < age, female, Non-DES (Drug-eluting stents) or SES (sirolimus-eluting stent).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.