ArticleMedicine2019
Impact of contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler ultrasound diagnosis for young adult with cryptogenic stroke: A protocol of systematic review.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to assess the impact of contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler ultrasound (cTCD) diagnosis for young adult with cryptogenic stroke (CS).
methodsThis study will analyze data from case-controlled studies investigating the impact of cTCD diagnosis for young adult with CS. A comprehensive literature search will be performed from PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data from their inceptions up to the August 1, 2019. All databases will be searched with no language limitations. Two researchers will independently carry out study selection, data collection, and study quality assessment. Any discrepancies between two researchers will be solved by a third researcher. We will apply RevMan 5.3 software and Stata 12.0 software for statistical analysis.
resultsOutcomes consist of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio for determination of cTCD diagnosis for young adult with CS.
conclusionThe results of this study may summarize up-to-date evidence of cTCD diagnosis for young adult with CS. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019145641.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.