Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31852010›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2024

The development of neonatal neurointensive care.

Topun Austin

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. HOPE and DREAM: A Two-Clinic NICU Follow-up Model.American journal of perinatology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Biomarkers and neuromonitoring for prognosis of development after perinatal brain damage].Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde : Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Topun AustinNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. ta338@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8428-8624
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

NIHR Brain Injury MedTech Co-OperativeNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain injury remains one of the major unsolved problems in neonatal care, with survivors at high risk of lifelong neurodisability. It is unlikely that a single intervention can ameliorate neonatal brain injury, given the complex interaction between pathological processes, developmental trajectory, genetic susceptibility, and environmental influences. However, a coordinated, interdisciplinary approach to understand the root cause enables early detection, and diagnosis with enhanced clinical care offering the best chance of improving outcomes and facilitate new lines of neuroprotective treatments. Adult neurointensive care has existed as a speciality in its own right for over 20 years; however, it is only recently that large prospective studies have demonstrated the benefit of this model of care. The 'Neuro-intensive Care Nursery' model originated at the University of California San Francisco in 2008, and since then a growing number of units worldwide have adopted this approach. As well as providing consistent coordinated care for infants from a multidisciplinary team, it provides opportunities for specialist education and training in neonatal neurology, neuromonitoring, neuroimaging and nursing. This review outlines the origins of brain-oriented care of the neonate and the development of the Neuro-NICU (neonatal intensive care unit) and discusses some of the challenges and opportunities in expanding this model of care.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalHumansInfant, NewbornNeurology

Identifiers

PMID31852010
OpenAlexW2995479281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.