Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31851958›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020

Many-isocenter optimization for robotic radiotherapy.

Qihui Lyu, Ryan Neph, Victoria Y Yu, Dan Ruan, Salime Boucher, Ke Sheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Compact X-Band Electron Linac for Radiotherapy and Security Applications.Radiation physics and chemistry (Oxford, England : 1993) · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qihui LyuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1835-3870
Ryan NephDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States of America.
Victoria Y YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States of America.
Dan RuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3400-7684
Salime BoucherRadiaBeam Technologies, Santa Monica, CA 90404, United States of America.
Ke ShengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, United States of America.

Funding

Development of a versatile robotic radiation therapy systemR44CA183390 · NCI · RADIABEAM TECHNOLOGIES, LLC · PI SHENG, KE, YONEMOTO, JAY · 2017 to 2024
$5.8M
Robust IMPT with automated beam orientation and scanning spot optimizationR01CA230278 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SHENG, KE · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
Motion Management of Pancreatic Cancer in MRI-Guided RadiotherapyR01CA188300 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SHENG, KE · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Development of intensity modulated radiation therapy for small animal researchR21CA228160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SHENG, KE · 2018 to 2019
$367k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188300NCI NIH HHS R01 CA230278NCI NIH HHS R21 CA228160NCI NIH HHS R44 CA183390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant dosimetric gains, clinical implementation of the 4π non-coplanar radiotherapy on the widely available C-arm gantry system is hindered by limited clearance, and the need to perform complex coordinated gantry and couch motion. A robotic radiotherapy platform would be conducive to such treatment but a new conflict between field size and MLC modulation resolution needs to be managed for versatile applications. This study investigates the dosimetry and delivery efficiency of purposefully creating many isocenters to achieve simultaneously high MLC modulation resolution and large tumor coverage. An integrated optimization framework was proposed for simultaneous beam orientation optimization (BOO), isocenter selection, and fluence map optimization (FMO). The framework includes a least-square dose fidelity objective, a total variation term for regularizing the fluence smoothness, and a group sparsity term for beam selection. A minimal number of isocenters were identified for efficient target coverage. Colliding beams excluded, high-resolution small-field 4π intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans with 50 cm source-to-isocenter distance (SID-50) on 10 Head and Neck (H&N) cancer patients were compared with low-resolution large-field plans with 100 cm SID (SID-100). With the same or better target coverage, the average reduction of [Dmean, Dmax] of 20-beam SID-50 plans from 20-beam SID-100 plans were [2.09 Gy, 1.19 Gy] for organs at risk (OARs) overall, [3.05 Gy, 0.04 Gy] for parotid gland, [3.62 Gy, 5.19 Gy] for larynx, and [3.27 Gy, 1.10 Gy] for mandible. R50 and integral dose were reduced by 5.3% and 9.6%, respectively. Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed significant difference (p   <  0.05) in planning target volume (PTV) homogeneity, PTV Dmax, R50, Integral dose, and OAR Dmean and Dmax. The estimated delivery time of 20-beam [SID-50, SID-100] plans were [19, 18] min and [14, 9] min, assuming 5 fractions and 30 fractions, respectively. With clinically acceptable delivery efficiency, many-isocenter optimization is dosimetrically desirable for treating large targets with high modulation resolution on the robotic platform.

Indexed as

RoboticsHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansRadiotherapy, Computer-AssistedRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID31851958
PMCPMC7100370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.