ArticleSoft robotics2020
Phase Changing Materials-Based Variable-Stiffness Tensegrity Structures.
Article in Soft robotics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adaptive multimodal swimming gaits in a reconfigurable modular soft robotic fish.Science advances · 2026Article
- Encoding mechanical intelligence using ultraprogrammable joints.Science advances · 2025Article
- A compliant metastructure design with reconfigurability up to six degrees of freedom.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Spikebot: A Multigait Tensegrity Robot with Linearly Extending Struts.Soft robotics · 2024Article
- Novel Technique to Increase the Effective Workspace of a Soft Robot.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Design and Analysis of a Novel Bionic Tensegrity Robotic Fish with a Continuum Body.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Magnetically induced stiffening for soft robotics.Soft matter · 2023Article
- Discussion on the possibility of multi-layer intelligent technologies to achieve the best recover of musculoskeletal injuries: Smart materials, variable structures, and intelligent therapeutic planning.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soft robots leverage deformable bodies to achieve different types of locomotion, improve transportability, and safely navigate cluttered environments. In this context, variable-stiffness structures provide soft robots with additional properties, such as the ability to increase forces transmitted to the environment, to lock into different body configurations, and to reduce the number of actuators required for morphological change. Tensegrity structures have been recently proposed as a biologically inspired design principle for soft robots. However, the few examples of tensegrity structures with variable stiffness displayed relatively small stiffness change (i.e., by a factor of 3) or resorted to multiple and bulky actuators. In this article, we describe a novel design approach to variable-stiffness tensegrity structures (VSTSs) that relies on the use of variable-stiffness cables (VSCs). As an example, we describe the design and implementation of a three-strut tensegrity structure with VSCs made of low melting point alloys. The resulting VSTS displays unprecedented stiffness changes by a factor of 28 in compression and 13 in bending. We show the capabilities of the proposed VSTS in three validation scenarios with different tensegrity architectures: (1) a beam with tunable load-bearing capability, (2) a structure that can self-deploy and lock its shape in both deployed and undeployed states, and (3) a joint with underactuated shape deformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.