ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2020
Empirical Evaluation of Computer-Adaptive Alternate Short Forms for the Assessment of Anomia Severity.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Aphasia Physical EXercise (APEX) study: feasibility of a new high-intensity functional interval training for stroke survivors with aphasia.Aphasiology · 2026Article
- Recognition Versus Ability to Use External Aids: An Exploratory Item Response Analysis of the Functional External Memory Aid Tool.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2025Article
- Assessing Relative Linguistic Impairment With Model-Based Item Selection.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- Response Latencies During Confrontation Picture Naming in Aphasia: Are Proxy Measurements Sufficient?Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Article
- Item Response Theory Modeling of the Verb Naming Test.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Accuracy of Naming Error Profiles Elicited From Adaptive Short Forms of the Philadelphia Naming Test.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- ParAlg: A Paraphasia Algorithm for Multinomial Classification of Picture Naming Errors.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- The Severity-Calibrated Aphasia Naming Test.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2022Article
- Beyond Percent Correct: Measuring Change in Individual Picture Naming Ability.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to verify the equivalence of 2 alternate test forms with nonoverlapping content generated by an item response theory (IRT)-based computer-adaptive test (CAT). The Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT; Roach, Schwartz, Martin, Grewal, & Brecher, 1996)was utilized as an item bank in a prospective, independent sample of persons with aphasia. Method Two alternate CAT short forms of the PNT were administered to a sample of 25 persons with aphasia who were at least 6 months postonset and received no treatment for 2 weeks before or during the study. The 1st session included administration of a 30-item PNT-CAT, and the 2nd session, conducted approximately 2 weeks later, included a variable-length PNT-CAT that excluded items administered in the 1st session and terminated when the modeled precision of the ability estimate was equal to or greater than the value obtained in the 1st session. The ability estimates were analyzed in a Bayesian framework. Results The 2 test versions correlated highly (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.