Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31851786›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

YAP1 amplification as a prognostic factor of definitive chemoradiotherapy in nonsurgical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Honghai Dai, Yang W Shao, Xiaoling Tong, Xue Wu, Jiaohui Pang, Alei Feng, Zhe Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deleterious mutations in esophageal carcinoma cuniculatum detected by next generation sequencing.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Honghai DaiTumor Research and Therapy Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yang W ShaoNanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc, Nanjing, China.
Xiaoling TongTranslational Medicine Research Institute, Geneseeq Technology Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4554-2180
Xue WuTranslational Medicine Research Institute, Geneseeq Technology Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jiaohui PangNanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc, Nanjing, China.
Alei FengTumor Research and Therapy Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Zhe YangTumor Research and Therapy Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4082-6088
Shandong University · CNNanjing Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefinitive chemoradiation therapy (dCRT) is the standard treatment for patients with nonsurgical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), yet patients have demonstrated great variations in their responses to dCRT and inevitably progressed following treatment.

methodsTo identify prognostic biomarkers, we performed targeted next-generation sequencing of 416 cancer-related genes on primary tumors from 47 nonsurgical ESCC patients prior to dCRT treatment. The association between genetic alterations and patients' local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was analyzed.

resultsTP53 (78% of patients), NOTCH1 (32%), ARID1A (13%), FAT1 (13%), and CDKN2A (13%) were commonly mutated in ESCC patients, while gene amplifications frequently occurred in MCL1 (36%), FGF19 (34%), MYC (32%), CCND1 (27%), ZNF217 (15%), CDKN2A (13%), and YAP1 (11%). Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical factors and genetic alterations indicated that sex is an independent prognostic factor, with males tending to have better LRFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.25; 95%CI, 0.08-0.77, P = .015) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR, 0.35; 95%CI, 0.13-0.93, P = .030) following dCRT. Meanwhile, YAP1 amplification (n = 7) was an adverse prognostic factor, and patients with this alteration demonstrated a tendency toward worse outcomes with shorter LRFS (HR, 4.06; 95%CI, 1.26-13.14, P = .019) and OS (HR, 2.78; 95%CI, 0.95-8.17, P = .062). In a subgroup analysis, while sex and M-stage were controlled, a much stronger negative effect of YAP1 amplification vs wild-type in LRFS was observed (log-rank P = .0067).

conclusionThe results suggested that YAP1 amplification is a potentially useful biomarker for predicting treatment outcomes and identifying patients with a high risk of relapse who should be closely monitored.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorChemoradiotherapyCisplatinDisease-Free SurvivalEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleFluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesGene AmplificationHumansMaleAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBiomarkers, TumorCisplatinFluorouracilTranscription FactorsYAP1 protein, humanYAP-Signaling Proteinschemoradiation therapyesophageal squamous cell carcinomalocal recurrence-free survivalnext-generation sequencingYAP1 amplification

Identifiers

PMID31851786
PMCPMC7050074
OpenAlexW2994726515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.