Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31851695›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Isolation of endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes from mouse brain.

Florian Bernard-Patrzynski, Marc-André Lécuyer, Ina Puscas, Imane Boukhatem, Marc Charabati, Lyne Bourbonnière, Charles Ramassamy, Grégoire Leclair, Alexandre Prat, V Gaëlle Roullin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integrin α8-Mediated Pericyte Morphogenesis Controls Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Florian Bernard-PatrzynskiFaculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8229-5049
Marc-André LécuyerDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Ina PuscasFaculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Imane BoukhatemFaculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Marc CharabatiDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Lyne BourbonnièreDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Charles RamassamyInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Armand-Frappier Institute, Laval, Québec, Canada.
Grégoire LeclairFaculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Alexandre PratDepartment of Neuroscience, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
V Gaëlle RoullinFaculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0790-5246

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary cell isolation from the central nervous system (CNS) has allowed fundamental understanding of blood-brain barrier (BBB) properties. However, poorly described isolation techniques or suboptimal cellular purity has been a weak point of some published scientific articles. Here, we describe in detail how to isolate and enrich, using a common approach, endothelial cells (ECs) from adult mouse brains, as well as pericytes (PCs) and astrocytes (ACs) from newborn mouse brains. Our approach allowed the isolation of these three brain cell types with purities of around 90%. Furthermore, using our protocols, around 3 times more PCs and 2 times more ACs could be grown in culture, as compared to previously published protocols. The cells were identified and characterized using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. The ability of ECs to form a tight monolayer was assessed for passages 0 to 3. The expression of claudin-5, occludin, zonula occludens-1, P-glycoprotein-1 and breast cancer resistance protein by ECs, as well as the ability of the cells to respond to cytokine stimuli (TNF-α, IFN-γ) was also investigated by q-PCR. The transcellular permeability of ECs was evaluated in the presence of pericytes or astrocytes in a Transwell® model by measuring the transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER), dextran-FITC and sodium fluorescein permeability. Overall, ECs at passages 0 and 1 featured the best properties valued in a BBB model. Furthermore, pericytes did not increase tightness of EC monolayers, whereas astrocytes did regardless of their seeding location. Finally, ECs resuspended in fetal bovine serum (FBS) and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) could be cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen without affecting their phenotype nor their capacity to form a tight monolayer, thus allowing these primary cells to be used for various longitudinal in vitro studies of the blood-brain barrier.

Indexed as

AstrocytesCell SeparationEndothelial CellsPericytesAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierBrainCell Culture TechniquesFemaleFlow CytometryMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, Confocal

Identifiers

PMID31851695
PMCPMC6919623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.