ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2020
The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.
Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retinotopic Spatial Working Memory Representations Are Not Affected by Task-irrelevant Visual Stimuli.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Top-down selection of visual working memory contents is supported by alpha-band phase-synchronized oscillatory networks.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Role of long-term memory in object-based attention for the maintenance of binding in visual working memory.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- To be or not to be relevant: Comparing short- and long-term consequences across working memory prioritization procedures.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Prioritizing flexible working memory representations through retrospective attentional strengthening.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Behavioral Prioritization Enhances Working Memory Precision and Neural Population Gain.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2022Article
- The Influence of Active Removal from Working Memory on Serial Dependence.Journal of cognition · 2022Article
- Object-based selection in visual working memory.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Article
- Does the presence of more features in a bound representation in working memory require extra object-based attention?Memory & cognition · 2021Article
- Working memory representations in visual cortex mediate distraction effects.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Comparing the prioritization of items and feature-dimensions in visual working memory.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Dissociable neural mechanisms underlie currently-relevant, future-relevant, and discarded working memory representations.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Different states of priority recruit different neural representations in visual working memory.PLoS biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although humans can hold multiple items in mind simultaneously, the contents of working memory (WM) can be selectively prioritized to guide future behavior. We explored whether the "same-object" benefits in visual processing may also be observed in visual WM. fMRI data were collected while participants performed a multistep serial retrocuing task in which they first viewed two 2-D objects (coherently moving colored dots). During retention, an initial relevance cue then indicated whether only the first or only the second object ("object-relevant"), or only the color of both objects or only their direction of motion would be relevant for the remainder of the trial ("feature-relevant"). On "object-relevant" trials, the ensuing priority cues selected either one of the features ("color" or "direction") bound to the relevance-cued object, whereas on "feature-relevant" trials, the priority cues selected one of the two relevance-cued features. Using multivariate inverted encoding models, we found a same-object benefit on object-relevant trials in occipitotemporal regions: On feature-relevant trials, the first priority cue triggered a strengthening of the neural representation of the cued feature and a concomitant weakening to baseline of the uncued feature, whereas on object-relevant trials, the cued item remained active but did not increase in strength and the uncued item weakened but remained significantly elevated throughout the delay period. Although the stimulus-specific representation in frontoparietal regions was weak and uneven, these regions closely tracked the higher order information of which stimulus category was relevant for behavior throughout the trial, suggesting an important role in controlling the prioritization of information in visual WM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.